Screening for malignancy in low back pain patients: a systematic review

被引:0
作者
Nicholas Henschke
Christopher G. Maher
Kathryn M. Refshauge
机构
[1] University of Sydney,Back Pain Research Group, School of Physiotherapy
来源
European Spine Journal | 2007年 / 16卷
关键词
Low back pain; Diagnosis; Malignancy; Red flags;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To describe the accuracy of clinical features and tests used to screen for malignancy in patients with low back pain. A systematic review was performed on all available records on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL electronic databases. Studies were considered eligible if they investigated a cohort of low back pain patients, used an appropriate reference standard, and reported sufficient data on the diagnostic accuracy of tests. Two authors independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data to calculate positive (LR+) and negative (LR−) likelihood ratios. Six studies evaluating 22 different clinical features and tests were identified. The prevalence of malignancy ranged from 0.1 to 3.5%. A previous history of cancer (LR+ = 23.7), elevated ESR (LR+ = 18.0), reduced hematocrit (LR+ = 18.2), and overall clinician judgement (LR+ = 12.1) increased the probability of malignancy when present. A combination of age ≥50 years, a previous history of cancer, unexplained weight loss, and failure to improve after 1 month had a reported sensitivity of 100%. Overall, there was poor reporting of methodological quality items, and very few studies were performed in community primary care settings. Malignancy is rare as a cause of low back pain. The most useful features and tests are a previous history of cancer, elevated ESR, reduced hematocrit, and clinician judgement.
引用
收藏
页码:1673 / 1679
页数:6
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Bossuyt PM(2003)The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration Ann Intern Med 138 W1-W12
[2]  
Reitsma JB(2001)Systematic reviews of diagnostic research. Considerations about assessment and incorporation of methodological quality Eur J Epidemiol 17 301-306
[3]  
Bruns DE(2002)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines BMC Med Res Methodol 2 92-99
[4]  
Gatsonis CA(1986)Lumbar spine films in primary care: current use and effects of selective ordering criteria J Gen Intern Med 1 20-25
[5]  
Glasziou PP(1988)Cancer as a cause of back pain: frequency, clinical presentation, and diagnostic strategies J Gen Intern Med 3 230-238
[6]  
Irwig LM(1992)What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA 268 760-765
[7]  
Moher D(1976)The significance of low back pain in older adults Can Med Assoc J 115 898-900
[8]  
Rennie D(1989)Selective criteria may increase lumbosacral spine roentgenogram use in acute low-back pain Arch Intern Med 149 47-50
[9]  
de Vet HC(1995)Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy J Clin Epidemiol 48 119-30
[10]  
Lijmer JG(2001)Finding cancer in primary care outpatients with low back pain: a comparison of diagnostic strategies J Gen Intern Med 16 14-23