Connecting Youth: The Role of Mentoring Approach

被引:0
作者
Laura J. Austin
McKenna F. Parnes
G. Roger Jarjoura
Thomas E. Keller
Carla Herrera
Manolya Tanyu
Sarah E. O. Schwartz
机构
[1] Suffolk University,Department of Psychology
[2] American Institutes for Research,undefined
[3] School of Social Work,undefined
[4] Portland State University,undefined
[5] Herrera Consulting Group,undefined
[6] LLC,undefined
来源
Journal of Youth and Adolescence | 2020年 / 49卷
关键词
Youth mentoring; Mentoring approach; Latent profile analysis; Connection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While formal youth mentoring can positively influence youth connectedness, little research has studied the specific approaches mentors engage in that support mentee social development. This study examines how mentors’ specific approaches are uniquely associated with youth connection outcomes in formal community-based mentoring. Participants were 766 youth, ranging in age from 11 to 14 (M = 12.29), 56.7% female, and racially/ethnically diverse (41.0% Black/African American, 21.4% Hispanic/Latinx, 20.0% White, 10.2% Multiracial/Multiethnic, 5.9% Native American, 1.2% other race, and 0.4% Asian/Pacific Islander). Person-centered analyses revealed three mentoring profiles which were differentially associated with youth outcomes: “Status Quo Mentors,” who reported low-to-moderate levels of closeness within the mentor–mentee dyad, low levels of connecting their mentees with programs and people in their community, and low levels of mediating for their mentees; “Close Connectors,” who reported moderate-to-high levels of closeness, moderate-to-high levels of connecting, and low levels of mediating; and “Connector-Mediators,” who reported moderate levels of closeness, connecting, and mediating. Youth mentored by “Close Connectors” demonstrated the greatest benefit, with significant improvements in parent–child relationship quality, extracurricular activity involvement, and help-seeking. Results suggest that community-based mentoring programs that emphasize connecting youth within their communities may be more effective in enhancing youth support networks.
引用
收藏
页码:2409 / 2428
页数:19
相关论文
共 160 条
[1]  
Ainsworth MDS(1989)Attachments beyond infancy American Psychologist 44 709-716
[2]  
Akaike H(1987)Factor analysis and AIC Psychometrika 52 317-332
[3]  
Allen JP(2007)The relation of attachment security to adolescents’ paternal and peer relationships, depression, and externalizing behavior Child Development 78 1222-1239
[4]  
Porter M(2006)The person-oriented versus the variable-oriented approach: are they complementary, opposites, or exploring different worlds? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 52 601-632
[5]  
McFarland C(2013)Pathways of influence in school-based mentoring: the mediating role of parent and teacher relationships Journal of School Psychology 51 129-142
[6]  
Boykin-McElhaney K(2010)After the bell: participation in extracurricular activities, classroom behavior, and academic achievement Sociology of Education 83 20-45
[7]  
Marsh P(2011)How effective are mentoring programs for youth? A systematic assessment of the evidence Psychological Science in the Public Interest 12 57-91
[8]  
Bergman LR(2017)Connectedness to family, school, peers, and community in socially vulnerable adolescents Children and Youth Services Review 81 321-331
[9]  
Trost K(2008)Participation in extracurricular activities in the middle school years: are there developmental benefits for African American and European American youth? Journal of Youth and Adolescence 37 1029-1043
[10]  
Chan CS(2016)Leveraging relational assets for adolescent development: a qualitative investigation of youth–adult “connection” in positive youth development Qualitative Psychology 3 59-78