Cochlear Implant Reliability: On the Reporting of Rates of Revision Surgery

被引:0
作者
Graham O’Neill
Neil S. Tolley
机构
[1] St Mary’s Hospital,Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery
来源
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | 2020年 / 72卷
关键词
Implanted device; Complications; Reliability; Revision surgery; Health service;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the magnitude of the risks associated with cochlear implantation. Results from a pool of thirty clinical studies involving cochlear implantation in over 6300 children were obtained from an internet search. The relevant data were transformed to a common time base (patient time) to allow an evaluation of events following implantation. The main outcome measure was cumulative survival probability for all-cause revision surgery. Over 10 years this was estimated to be 0.71. Thus, at 10 years post-implantation close to 30% of children with unilateral implants will have undergone revision surgery. This figure is considerably greater than that commonly reported for overall revision rates and illustrates the importance of interpreting results with respect to the relevant time frame. When non and low-use is incorporated into the analysis the above figure rises to about 37% of children affected. The findings raise concerns about the information provided to both individuals and regulatory bodies regarding the risks associated with cochlear implantation. The consequences for bilateral implantation are apparent. Our recommendations are i) a full disclosure to parents and children of the true magnitude of the risks and ii) for a body with significant expertise in reliability and systems engineering, and no conflicts of interest, to play a major role in the regulatory management of this service.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 266
页数:9
相关论文
共 182 条
  • [1] Borovkova S(2002)Analysis of survival data NAW 3 302-307
  • [2] Murray DW(1997)Loss to follow-up matters J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 79B 254-257
  • [3] Britton AR(1993)Survival analysis of joint replacements J Bone Joint Surg 75B 697-704
  • [4] Bulstrode CJK(1994)Upward bias in estimates of pacemaker reliability: effect of unreported patient mortality JACC 24 1078-1081
  • [5] Murray DW(2005)European consensus statement on cochlear implant failures and explantations Otol Neurotol 26 1097-1099
  • [6] Carr AJ(2014)Rates of revision and device failure in cochlear implant surgery: a 30-year experience Laryngoscope 124 2393-2399
  • [7] Bulstrode C(2002)Problems in dealing with missing data and informative censoring in clinical trials Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med 3 4-296
  • [8] Leitch JW(2010)Adult cochlear implantation in Canada: results of a survey Rev Can Ortho d’audiol 34 290-142
  • [9] Dear K(2008)Cochlear implants: system design, integration and evaluation IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 1 115-224
  • [10] Curteis P(2008)The cost and analysis of nonuse of cochlear implants Otol Neurol 29 221-430