Optimality modelling in the real world

被引:0
|
作者
Jean-Sébastien Bolduc
Frank Cézilly
机构
[1] Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1,Equipe Ecologie du comportement et Ecologie des populations, UMR CNRS 5558 LBBE: Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive
[2] Université de Panthéon-Sorbonne Paris-1,Institut d’Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Techniques, UMR CNRS 8590
[3] Université de Bourgogne,Equipe Ecologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5561 Biogéosciences
来源
Biology & Philosophy | 2012年 / 27卷
关键词
Adaptationism; Optimal foraging theory; Optimality; Fitness; Animal behaviour; Behavioural ecology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In a recent paper, Potochnik (Biol Philos 24(2):183–197, 2009) analyses some uses of optimality modelling in light of the anti-adaptationism criticism. She distinguishes two broad classes of such uses (weak and strong) on the basis of assumptions held by biologists about the role and the importance of natural selection. This is an interesting proposal that could help in the epistemological characterisation of some biological practices. However, Potochnik’s distinction also rests on the assumption that all optimality modelling represent the selection dynamic involved in the system of phenomena being considered. Since this assumption does not hold for models belonging to optimal foraging theory (OFT)—one of behavioural ecology’s important modelling traditions—Potochnik’s proposal has to be critically reappraised. In this paper, we briefly discuss what is optimality modelling and what it means for a model to represent a dynamic of selection or of evolution. Then, we demonstrate that OFT modelling is unable to represent either past or contemporary selection dynamics. In order to make this point, we carefully delineate the theory’s rationale. This allows us to identify and analyse the assumptions on which the theory is built, and to circumscribe precisely the role that natural selection plays in it. Next, we show that the distinction of weak and strong uses of optimality modelling is seriously weakened when OFT modelling is taken into account. More precisely, the distinction is either irrelevant (if the assumption that selection dynamics are represented in all optimality modelling is held) or of a modest utility (if the assumption is dropped). However, we suggest that Potochnik’s original proposal could be saved, and that it even constitutes a tool to appraise the marks left in the literature by the evolution of optimality modelling practices in the last four decades, provided that it is made into a tripartite distinction.
引用
收藏
页码:851 / 869
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimality modelling in the real world
    Bolduc, Jean-Sebastien
    Cezilly, Frank
    BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 2012, 27 (06) : 851 - 869
  • [2] Optimality modeling in a suboptimal world
    Potochnik, Angela
    BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 2009, 24 (02) : 183 - 197
  • [3] Optimality modeling in a suboptimal world
    Angela Potochnik
    Biology & Philosophy, 2009, 24 : 183 - 197
  • [4] Beyond bellman's principle of optimality; The principle of "real-time optimality" (RTO)
    Johnson, CD
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SEVENTH SOUTHEASTERN SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEM THEORY, 2005, : 326 - 335
  • [5] Optimality-based modelling of climate impacts on global potential wheat yield
    Qiao, Shengchao
    Wang, Han
    Prentice, I. Colin
    Harrison, Sandy P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (11):
  • [6] Optimality Models and the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness
    Jonathan Roffe, Ariel
    Ginnobili, Santiago
    ACTA BIOTHEORETICA, 2020, 68 (03) : 367 - 385
  • [7] Optimality Models and the Propensity Interpretation of Fitness
    Ariel Jonathan Roffé
    Santiago Ginnobili
    Acta Biotheoretica, 2020, 68 : 367 - 385
  • [8] Optimality and small Δ-optimality of martingale estimating functions
    Jacobsen, M
    BERNOULLI, 2002, 8 (05) : 643 - 668
  • [9] Real-world effectiveness of Ergonomic methods
    MacLeod, IS
    APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2003, 34 (05) : 465 - 477
  • [10] Adaptation, fitness and the selection-optimality links
    Samir Okasha
    Cédric Paternotte
    Biology & Philosophy, 2014, 29 : 225 - 232