What Can Educational Psychology Learn From, and Contribute to, Theory Development Scholarship?

被引:0
作者
Jeffrey A. Greene
机构
[1] University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,School of Education
来源
Educational Psychology Review | 2022年 / 34卷
关键词
Theory; Theory development; Open science; Research methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the field of psychology’s stated goals is to produce scholarship with findings that benefit the world. Over the last 10 years, psychology scholarship and its presumed societal benefits have been called into question due to the field’s history of questionable research practices, racism, and epistemic oppression. Calls for methodological, ethical, and practical reforms are essential to building a psychological science that is just, effective, reliable, and beneficial. Recently, these calls have been complemented by a push to reform how theory is developed and used in psychology. There is great need for better understanding and implementation of theory development, both in the field of psychology broadly as well as in its subdisciplines, including educational psychology. At the same time, educational psychologists have much to contribute to the tripartite calls for methodological, ethical, and theory reforms. In this paper, I explore theory development in psychology by discussing the importance of developing both the descriptive and explanatory aspects of theory as well as the need to refine how theory is evaluated and integrated. Then, I review how innovations and practices in educational psychology can inform the broader theory reform movement in psychology writ large. Finally, I identify important future directions for further advancing theory reform in psychology, including addressing ableism in the field, increasing the field’s hospitability for theory revision, furthering theory development transparency, and more deeply integrating theory development into preparation programs.
引用
收藏
页码:3011 / 3035
页数:24
相关论文
共 194 条
  • [1] Alexander PA(2009)What is learning anyway? A Topographical Perspective Considered. Educational Psychologist 44 176-192
  • [2] Schallert DL(2001)Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective Annual Review of Psychology 52 1-26
  • [3] Reynolds RE(2018)On the goals of epistemic education: Promoting apt epistemic performance Journal of the Learning Sciences 27 353-389
  • [4] Bandura A(2020)A review of educational responses to the “post-truth” condition: Four lenses on “post-truth” problems Educational Psychologist 55 107-119
  • [5] Barzilai S(2008)The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence British Journal of Educational Technology 39 775-786
  • [6] Chinn CA(2021)So useful as a good theory? The practicality crisis in (social) psychological theory Perspectives on Psychological Science 16 864-874
  • [7] Barzilai S(2020)Can a brief, digital skill training intervention help undergraduates “learn to learn” and improve their STEM achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology 112 765-664
  • [8] Chinn CA(2019)Ableism special issue introduction Journal of Social Issues 75 650-15
  • [9] Bennett S(2005)Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation Educational Researcher 34 3-766
  • [10] Maton K(2021)Theory construction methodology: A practical framework for theory formation in psychology Perspectives on Psychological Science 16 755-45