Talk the Walk: Measuring the Impact of Strategic Philanthropy

被引:0
作者
Karen Maas
Kellie Liket
机构
[1] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Erasmus School of Economics
[2] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Erasmus Centre for Strategic Philanthropy (ECSP)
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2011年 / 100卷
关键词
strategic philanthropy; impact measurement; performance measurement; corporate social performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drawing a framework from institutional and legitimacy theory, supplemented by concepts from the accounting literature, this study uses longitudinal cross-sectional and cross-national data on over 500 firms listed in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) to empirically test whether these firms are strategic in their philanthropy as indicated by their measurement of the impact of their philanthropic activities along three dimensions – society, business, and reputation and stakeholder satisfaction. It is predicted that the variables’ company size, amount of philanthropic expenditure, region and industry influence the extent to which the various impact dimensions of philanthropy are measured. Though unexpected considering the lack of common practice in impact measurement, it is found that between 62 and 76% of the DJSI firms measure some sort of impact of their philanthropic activities, mostly impact on society and impact on reputation and stakeholder satisfaction. The number of firms that measure impact increases over the years and so does the number of firms that measure multiple dimensions of impact. Consist with our predictions, we find that larger firms and firms with relatively higher philanthropic expenditures are more likely to measure impact. Moreover, firms in the financial sector and firms from Europe and North America are also more likely to measure impact of their philanthropic activities.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 464
页数:19
相关论文
共 111 条
[11]  
Waterhouse J. H.(2005)A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research and Theory on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance Business and Society 44 283-317
[12]  
Buchholtz A.(2004)Corporate Social Performance as a Business Strategy Journal of Business Ethics 55 395-410
[13]  
Amason A. C.(1983)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields American Sociological Review 48 147-160
[14]  
Rutherfords M.(1982)Corporate Contributions: Altruistic or For-Profit? The Academy of Management Journal 25 94-106
[15]  
Carrigan M.(2005)The Relationship Between Corporate Philanthropy and Shareholder Wealth: A Risk Management Perspective Academy of Management Review 30 777-798
[16]  
Carroll A. B.(2001)Towards Explaining Stability In and Around Management Accounting Systems Management Accounting Research 12 141-166
[17]  
Carroll A. B.(1980)The Impact of International Accounting Differences from a Security-Analysis Perspective: Some European Evidence Journal of Accounting Research 18 64-76
[18]  
Chenhall R.(1988)Towards a Theory of Cultural Influence on the Development of Accounting Systems Internationally Abacus 24 1-15
[19]  
Langfield-Smith K.(2001)Thirty Years of Social Accounting, Reporting and Auditing: What (If Anything) Have We Learnt? Business Ethics 10 9-15
[20]  
Davidson W. N.(2002)The Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging Engagement, Imaginings, New Accountings and Prag- matism Over Critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society 27 687-708