The benefits of testing for learning on later performance

被引:0
作者
Meghan M. McConnell
Christina St-Onge
Meredith E. Young
机构
[1] McMaster University,Program for Educational Research and Development, Faculty of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics
[2] Université de Sherbrooke,Department of Medicine and Centre de pédagogie des sciences de la santé, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
[3] McGill University,Centre for Medical Education and Department of Medicine
来源
Advances in Health Sciences Education | 2015年 / 20卷
关键词
Assessment; Learning; Medical education; Question format; Testing effect; Test-enhanced learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Testing has been shown to enhance retention of learned information beyond simple studying, a phenomena known as test-enhanced learning (TEL). Research has shown that TEL effects are greater for tests that require the production of responses [e.g., short-answer questions (SAQs)] relative to tests that require the recognition of correct answers [e.g., multiple-choice questions (MCQs)]. High stakes licensure examinations have recently differentiated MCQs that require the application of clinical knowledge (context-rich MCQs) from MCQs that rely on the recognition of “facts” (context-free MCQs). The present study investigated the influence of different types of educational activities (including studying, SAQs, context-rich MCQs and context-free MCQs) on later performance on a mock licensure examination. Fourth-year medical students (n = 224) from four Quebec universities completed four educational activities: one reading-based activity and three quiz-based activities (SAQs, context-rich MCQs, and context-free MCQs). We assessed the influence of the type of educational activity on students’ subsequent performance in a mock licensure examination, which consisted of two types of context-rich MCQs: (1) verbatim replications of previous items and (2) items that tested the same learning objective but were new. Mean accuracy scores on the mock licensure exam were higher when intervening educational activities contained either context-rich MCQs (Mean z-score = 0.40) or SAQs (M = 0.39) compared to context-free MCQs (M = −0.38) or study only items (M = −0.42; all p < 0.001). Higher mean scores were only present for verbatim items (p < 0.001). The benefit of testing was observed when intervening educational activities required either the generation of a response (SAQs) or the application of knowledge (context-rich MCQs); however, this effect was only observed for verbatim test items. These data provide evidence that context-rich MCQs and SAQs enhance learning through testing compared to context-free MCQs or studying alone. The extent to which these findings generalize beyond verbatim questions remains to be seen.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 320
页数:15
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Barnett SM(2002)When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer Psychological Bulletin 128 612-637
[2]  
Ceci SJ(2008)Teaching to test or testing to teach? Medical Education 42 952-953
[3]  
Boulet J(2010)Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36 1118-1133
[4]  
Butler AC(2007)Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 19 514-527
[5]  
Butler AC(2012)Testing enhances the transfer of learning Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 279-283
[6]  
Roediger HL(2006)Impoverished cue sup-port enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect Memory & Cognition 34 268-276
[7]  
Carpenter SK(1992)The influence of retrieval on retention Memory & Cognition 20 633-642
[8]  
Carpenter SK(2013)Back to basics: Keeping students cognitively active between the classroom and the examination Medical Education 47 641-643
[9]  
DeLosh EL(2010)Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials Memory 18 49-57
[10]  
Carrier M(2006)Retrieval-induced facilitation: Initially nontested material can benefit from prior testing of related material Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 553-571