Sensitivity and specificity of metatranscriptomics as an arbovirus surveillance tool

被引:0
作者
Jana Batovska
Peter T. Mee
Stacey E. Lynch
Tim I. Sawbridge
Brendan C. Rodoni
机构
[1] Agriculture Victoria Research,
[2] AgriBio Centre for AgriBioscience,undefined
[3] School of Applied Systems Biology,undefined
[4] La Trobe University,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The ability to identify all the viruses within a sample makes metatranscriptomic sequencing an attractive tool to screen mosquitoes for arboviruses. Practical application of this technique, however, requires a clear understanding of its analytical sensitivity and specificity. To assess this, five dilutions (1:1, 1:20, 1:400, 1:8,000 and 1:160,000) of Ross River virus (RRV) and Umatilla virus (UMAV) isolates were spiked into subsamples of a pool of 100 Culex australicus mosquitoes. The 1:1 dilution represented the viral load of one RRV-infected mosquito in a pool of 100 mosquitoes. The subsamples underwent nucleic acid extraction, mosquito-specific ribosomal RNA depletion, and Illumina HiSeq sequencing. The viral load of the subsamples was also measured using reverse transcription droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR) and quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). Metatranscriptomic sequencing detected both RRV and UMAV in the 1:1, 1:20 and 1:400 subsamples. A high specificity was achieved, with 100% of RRV and 99.6% of UMAV assembled contigs correctly identified. Metatranscriptomic sequencing was not as sensitive as RT-qPCR or RT-ddPCR; however, it recovered whole genome information and detected 19 other viruses, including four first detections for Australia. These findings will assist arbovirus surveillance programs in utilising metatranscriptomics in routine surveillance activities to enhance arbovirus detection.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity and specificity of metatranscriptomics as an arbovirus surveillance tool
    Batovska, Jana
    Mee, Peter T.
    Lynch, Stacey E.
    Sawbridge, Tim, I
    Rodoni, Brendan C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [2] Sensitivity and specificity of surveillance methods
    Glenister, H
    BAILLIERES CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1996, 3 (02): : 197 - 210
  • [3] ARBOVIRUS SURVEILLANCE
    Scarpino, Samuel V.
    Meyers, Lauren Ancel
    Johansson, Michael A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2017, 97 (05) : 259 - 260
  • [4] Arbovirus surveillance in California
    Eldridge, BF
    Scott, TW
    Reisen, WK
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE UTAH MOSQUITO ABATEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1998, : 14 - 14
  • [5] Assessing surveillance using sensitivity, specificity and timeliness
    Kleinman, Ken P.
    Abrams, Allyson M.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (05) : 445 - 464
  • [6] Vector Specificity of Arbovirus Transmission
    Viglietta, Marine
    Bellone, Rachel
    Blisnick, Adrien Albert
    Failloux, Anna-Bella
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [7] Metatranscriptomics: A Tool for Clinical Metagenomics
    Tyagi, Shivani
    Katara, Pramod
    OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 28 (08) : 394 - 407
  • [8] Using simulation to assess the sensitivity and specificity of a signal detection tool for multidimensional public health surveillance data
    Rolka, H
    Bracy, D
    Russel, C
    Fram, D
    Ball, R
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 24 (04) : 551 - 562
  • [9] ARBOVIRUS SURVEILLANCE IN ILLINOIS IN 1976
    CLARK, GG
    PRETULA, HL
    JAKUBOWSKI, T
    HURD, MA
    MOSQUITO NEWS, 1977, 37 (03): : 389 - 395
  • [10] ARBOVIRUS ENCEPHALITIS SURVEILLANCE IN IOWA
    WONG, YW
    DORSEY, DC
    HUMPHREYS, MJ
    HAUSLER, WJ
    HEALTH LABORATORY SCIENCE, 1970, 7 (03) : 117 - +