The Kalām Cosmological Argument, the Big Bang, and Atheism

被引:0
作者
John J. Park
机构
[1] Christopher Newport University,Philosophy & Religious Studies Department
来源
Acta Analytica | 2016年 / 31卷
关键词
Philosophy of religion; Metaphysics; Philosophy of physics; Big Bang Theory; God’s existence; Atheism;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While there has been much work on cosmological arguments, novel objections will be presented against the modern day rendition of the Kalām cosmological argument as standardly articulated by William Lane Craig. The conclusion is reached that this cosmological argument and several of its variants do not lead us to believe that there is inevitably a supernatural cause to the universe. Moreover, a conditional argument for atheism will be presented in light of the Big Bang Theory.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 335
页数:12
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Craig W(1997)In defense of the Kalām cosmological argument Faith and Philosophy 14 236-247
[2]  
Grunbaum A(1993)Narlikar’s “creation” of the big bang universe was a mere origination Philosophy of Science 60 638-646
[3]  
Grünbaum A(1994)Some comments on William Craig’s ‘creation and big bang cosmology Philosophia Naturalis 31 225-236
[4]  
Kabay P(2005)An infinite temporal regress is compatible with the International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 123-138
[5]  
Koons R(1997)A new look at the cosmological argument American Philosophical Quarterly 34 193-211
[6]  
Moreland J(2003)A response to a platonistic and to a set-theoretic objection to the Kalām cosmological argument Religious Studies 36 373-390
[7]  
Morriston W(2002)Causes and beginnings in the Kalām argument: reply to Craig Faith and Philosophy 19 233-244
[8]  
Oderberg D(2001)The Kalām cosmological argument neither bloodies nor bowed: a response to Graham Oppy Philosophia Christi 3 193-196
[9]  
Oderberg D(2002)Traversal of the infinite. The “big bang” and the kalam cosmological argument Philosophia Christi 4 305-334
[10]  
Oppy G(1991)Craig, Mackie, and the Kalām cosmological argument Religious Studies 27 189-197