A mixed-effects location-scale model for ordinal questionnaire data

被引:7
作者
Hedeker D. [1 ]
Mermelstein R.J. [2 ]
Demirtas H. [2 ]
Berbaum M.L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., Room W254, MC2000, Chicago, 60637, IL
[2] University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
关键词
Extreme response styles; IRT; Proportional odds model; Scaling model; Variance modeling;
D O I
10.1007/s10742-016-0145-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In health studies, questionnaire items are often scored on an ordinal scale, for example on a Likert scale. For such questionnaires, item response theory (IRT) models provide a useful approach for obtaining summary scores for subjects (i.e., the model’s random subject effect) and characteristics of the items (e.g., item difficulty and discrimination). In this article, we describe a model that allows the items to additionally exhibit different within-subject variance, and also includes a subject-level random effect to the within-subject variance specification. This permits subjects to be characterized in terms of their mean level, or location, and their variability, or scale, and the model allows item difficulty and discrimination in terms of both random subject effects (location and scale). We illustrate application of this location-scale mixed model using data from the Social Subscale of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire assessed in an adolescent study. We show that the proposed model fits the data significantly better than simpler IRT models, and is able to identify items and subjects that are not well-fit by the simpler models. The proposed model has useful applications in many areas where questionnaires are often rated on an ordinal scale, and there is interest in characterizing subjects in terms of both their mean and variability. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 131
页数:14
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Agresti A., Lang J.B., A proportional odds model with subject-specific effects for repeated ordered categorical responses, Biometrika, 80, pp. 527-534, (1993)
[2]  
Aitkin M., Modelling variance heterogeneity in normal regression using GLIM, Appl. Stat., 36, pp. 332-339, (1987)
[3]  
Bock R.D., Aitken M., Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: application of an EM algorithm, Psychometrika, 46, pp. 443-459, (1981)
[4]  
Cooper M.L., Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: development and validation of a four-factor model, Psychol. Assess., 6, pp. 117-128, (1994)
[5]  
Cox C., Location-scale cumulative odds models for ordinal data: a generalized non-linear model approach, Stat. Med., 14, pp. 1191-1203, (1995)
[6]  
Dierker L., Mermelstein R., Early emerging nicotine-dependence symptoms: a signal of propensity for chronic smoking behavior in adolescents, J. Pediatr., 156, pp. 818-822, (2010)
[7]  
Dorman J., The effect of clustering on statistical tests: an illustration using classroom environment data, Educ. Psychol., 28, pp. 583-595, (2008)
[8]  
Ezzet F., Whitehead J., A random effects model for ordinal responses from a crossover trial, Stat. Med., 10, pp. 901-907, (1991)
[9]  
Harvey A.C., Estimating regression models with multiplicative heteroscedasticity, Econometrica, 44, pp. 461-465, (1976)
[10]  
Hedeker D., Berbaum M., Mermelstein R., Location-scale models for multilevel ordinal data: between- and within-subjects variance modeling, J. Probab. Stat. Sci., 4, pp. 1-20, (2006)