Balancing feasibility and comprehensiveness: examining medications for reducing emergency hospital admissions

被引:0
作者
Michael R. Gionfriddo
机构
[1] Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes,
[2] Geisinger Precision Health Center,undefined
来源
BMC Medicine | / 16卷
关键词
Emergency admissions; Unplanned admissions; Medications; GRADE; Guidelines; Prioritization; Systematic reviews; Overview of reviews; Umbrella reviews; Search strategy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Emergency hospital admissions are common, with several interventions having been developed to reduce their rates. Bobrovitz et al. summarized the available body of evidence regarding pharmacologic therapies aimed at reducing emergency hospital admissions, and identified 28 medications for which high- or moderate-quality evidence supports their use, 11 of which were identified as being supported by current guideline recommendations. Additionally, the authors identified 28 medications supported by low- or very low-quality evidence, which can serve as targets for future research. The article by Bobrovitz et al. presents a good summary of the evidence, albeit with limitations in the search strategy that cannot guarantee the review as comprehensive. Despite this, the review has important implications for policymakers, guideline panels, researchers, clinicians, and funders since the identified medications can either be targets for quality improvement initiatives or for future research. Bobrovitz et al.’s review highlights the challenge that systematic reviewers face when balancing feasibility and comprehensiveness.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 100 条
  • [1] Payne RA(2014)Is polypharmacy always hazardous? A retrospective cohort analysis using linked electronic health records from primary and secondary care Br J Clin Pharmacol 77 1073-1082
  • [2] Abel GA(2014)Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials JAMA Intern Med 174 1095-1107
  • [3] Avery AJ(2018)Medications that reduce emergency hospital admissions: an overview of systematic reviews and prioritizations of treatments BMC Med 16 115-140
  • [4] Mercer SW(2015)Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach Int J Evid Based Healthc 13 132-123
  • [5] Roland MO(2005)EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? Can Fam Physician 51 849-144
  • [6] Leppin AL(2017)Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study Systematic Rev 6 245-1463
  • [7] Gionfriddo MR(2002)Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study Int J Epidemiol 31 115-735
  • [8] Kessler M(2012)The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies Int J Technol Assess Health Care 28 138-725
  • [9] Bobrovitz N(2013)Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medicine must search Chinese databases to reduce language bias eCAM 2013 812179-undefined
  • [10] Heneghan C(2007)Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 MR000010-undefined