Infinite motion and 2-distinguishability of graphs and groups

被引:19
作者
Imrich, Wilfried [1 ]
Smith, Simon M. [2 ]
Tucker, Thomas W. [3 ]
Watkins, Mark E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leoben, A-8700 Leoben, Austria
[2] CUNY, NYC Coll Technol, Dept Math, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Colgate Univ, Dept Math, Hamilton, NY 13346 USA
[4] Syracuse Univ, Dept Math, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
基金
奥地利科学基金会;
关键词
Distinguishing number; Distinguishability; Automorphism; Infinite graph; Infinite permutation group; Motion; Orbit-equivalence; NO REGULAR ORBITS; DISTINGUISHING NUMBER; CARTESIAN POWERS; DISTINGUISHABILITY; SET;
D O I
10.1007/s10801-014-0529-2
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
A group A acting faithfully on a set X is 2-distinguishable if there is a 2-coloring of X that is not preserved by any nonidentity element of A, equivalently, if there is a proper subset of X with trivial setwise stabilizer. The motion of an element a is an element of A is the number of points of X that are moved by a, and the motion of the group A is the minimal motion of its nonidentity elements. When A is finite, the Motion Lemma says that if the motion of A is large enough (specifically at least 2 log(2) vertical bar A vertical bar), then the action is 2-distinguishable. For many situations where X has a combinatorial or algebraic structure, the Motion Lemma implies that the action of Aut(X) on X is 2-distinguishable in all but finitely many instances. We prove an infinitary version of the Motion Lemma for countably infinite permutation groups, which states that infinite motion is large enough to guarantee 2-distinguishability. From this, we deduce a number of results, including the fact that every locally finite, connected graph whose automorphism group is countably infinite is 2-distinguishable. One cannot extend the Motion Lemma to uncountable permutation groups, but nonetheless we prove that (under the permutation topology) every closed permutation group with infinite motion has a dense subgroup which is 2-distinguishable. We conjecture an extension of the Motion Lemma which we expect holds for a restricted class of uncountable permutation groups, and we conclude with a list of open questions. The consequences of our results are drawn for orbit equivalence of infinite permutation groups.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 122
页数:14
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Albertson M., 1996, ELECTRON J COMB, V3, pR18
[2]  
Albertson MO, 2005, ELECTRON J COMB, V12
[3]  
[Anonymous], GROUPS ST ANDREWS 20
[4]   Base size, metric dimension and other invariants of groups and graphs [J].
Bailey, Robert F. ;
Cameron, Peter J. .
BULLETIN OF THE LONDON MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 43 :209-242
[5]  
Barwise J., 1968, LNM, V72
[6]   ON GROUPS WITH NO REGULAR ORBITS ON THE SET OF SUBSETS [J].
CAMERON, PJ ;
NEUMANN, PM ;
SAXL, J .
ARCHIV DER MATHEMATIK, 1984, 43 (04) :295-296
[7]  
Chan M, 2006, ELECTRON J COMB, V13
[8]   Motion and distinguishing number two [J].
Conder, Marston ;
Tucker, Thomas .
ARS MATHEMATICA CONTEMPORANEA, 2011, 4 (01) :63-72
[9]  
Cuno J, 2014, ARS MATH CONTEMP, V7, P201
[10]   A NOTE ON AUTOMORPHISM-GROUPS OF COUNTABLY INFINITE STRUCTURES [J].
EVANS, DM .
ARCHIV DER MATHEMATIK, 1987, 49 (06) :479-483