Outcomes of a Series of Patients with Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence Treated with an Adjustable Transobturator Male System or Artificial Urinary Sphincter

[1] Siegel RL(2020)Cancer statistics, 2020 CA Cancer J Clin 70 7-30

[2] Miller KD(2019)How can we prevent postprostatectomy urinary incontinence by patient selection, and by preoperative, peroperative, and postoperative measures? International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society 2018 Neurourol Urodyn 38 S119-S126

[3] Jemal A(2016)Artificial urinary sphincter mechanical failures—is it better to replace the entire device or just the malfunctioning component? J Urol 195 1523-1528

[4] Averbeck MA(2015)Long-term outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement: an analysis of 1082 cases at Mayo Clinic Urology 86 602-607

[5] Marcelissen T(2013)The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence Eur Urol. 63 681-689

[6] Anding R(2019)Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up Neurourol Urodyn 38 710-718

[7] Rahnama'i MS(2016)Evaluation and management of postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review of current literature Eur Urol Focus 2 245-259

[8] Sahai A(2017)Outcome measures of adjustable transobturator male system with pre-attached scrotal port for male stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy Adv Ther 34 1173-1183

[9] Tubaro A(2018)Treatment of stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy with the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) with preattached scrotal port Actas Urol Esp 42 473-482

[10] Linder BJ(2019)Effectiveness of adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) to treat male stress incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adv Ther 36 426-441

[1] Siegel RL(2020)Cancer statistics, 2020 CA Cancer J Clin 70 7-30

[2] Miller KD(2019)How can we prevent postprostatectomy urinary incontinence by patient selection, and by preoperative, peroperative, and postoperative measures? International Consultation on Incontinence-Research Society 2018 Neurourol Urodyn 38 S119-S126

[3] Jemal A(2016)Artificial urinary sphincter mechanical failures—is it better to replace the entire device or just the malfunctioning component? J Urol 195 1523-1528

[4] Averbeck MA(2015)Long-term outcomes following artificial urinary sphincter placement: an analysis of 1082 cases at Mayo Clinic Urology 86 602-607

[5] Marcelissen T(2013)The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence Eur Urol. 63 681-689

[6] Anding R(2019)Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up Neurourol Urodyn 38 710-718

[7] Rahnama'i MS(2016)Evaluation and management of postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review of current literature Eur Urol Focus 2 245-259

[8] Sahai A(2017)Outcome measures of adjustable transobturator male system with pre-attached scrotal port for male stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy Adv Ther 34 1173-1183

[9] Tubaro A(2018)Treatment of stress urinary incontinence after prostatectomy with the adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) with preattached scrotal port Actas Urol Esp 42 473-482

[10] Linder BJ(2019)Effectiveness of adjustable transobturator male system (ATOMS) to treat male stress incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adv Ther 36 426-441