Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Equity Prices

被引:1
作者
Li Cai
Chaohua He
机构
[1] Illinois Institute of Technology,Stuart School of Business
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2014年 / 125卷
关键词
Corporate environmental responsibility; Market efficiency; Underpricing; Moral attachment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper uses an innovative way to screen stocks and analyzes the relationship between corporate environmental responsibility and long-run stock returns. By our definition, an environmentally responsible (green) company gives no environmental concern and shows environmental strength(s). Using 20 years’ data of 1992–2011, we find evidence that environmentally responsible company outperforms, in the 4th to 7th year after the screening year. An equal-weighted environmentally responsible portfolio earned an annual four-factor alpha of 4.06 % in the 4th year, 3.00 % above industry benchmarks, and 3.87 % above characteristic benchmarks. The results are robust to alternative portfolio weighting methodologies, controlling for firm characteristics, and the removal of outliers. Testing using industry-adjusted Tobin’s Q, we find consistent evidence that environmental strength creates firm value. We argue that environmental responsibility is an intangible asset, likely to be undervalued by the market, especially in the long horizon, thereby causing environmentally responsible companies to exhibit long-horizon excess returns.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 635
页数:18
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Baker M.(2004)Market liquidity as a sentiment indicator Journal of Financial Markets, 7 271-299
  • [2] Stein J. C.(2007)Mutual fund attributes and investor behavior Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 42 683-708
  • [3] Bollen N. P. B.(2006)Corporate social performance and stock returns: UK evidence from disaggregate measures Financial Management, 35 97-117
  • [4] Brammer S.(2012)Do socially responsible index investors incur an opportunity cost? Financial Review, 47 617-630
  • [5] Brooks C.(1998)Alternative factor specifications, security characteristics, and the cross-section of expected stock returns Journal of Financial Economics, 49 345-373
  • [6] Pavelin S(1997)On persistence in mutual fund performance Journal of Finance, 52 57-82
  • [7] Branch B. S.(2009)How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 18 125-169
  • [8] Cai L.(2011)Green and good? The investment performance of US environmental mutual funds Journal of Business Ethics, 103 275-287
  • [9] Brennan M. J.(2005)Firm size and the effect of R&D on Tobin’s R&D Management, 35 217-223
  • [10] Chordia T.(1997)Measuring mutual fund performance with characteristic-based benchmarks Journal of Finance, 52 1035-1058