Emergence: A Systems Theory’s Challenge to Ethics

被引:0
作者
Vladislav Valentinov
Stefan Hielscher
Ingo Pies
机构
[1] Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development,Chair of Economic Ethics
[2] Martin Luther University,undefined
来源
Systemic Practice and Action Research | 2016年 / 29卷
关键词
Emergence; Niklas Luhmann; Moral communication; Systems theory; Economic system;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper reconstructs Niklas Luhmann’s diagnosis of the dysfunctional character of moral communication in the modern society by emphasizing the emergent character of today’s moral problems. In the systems-theoretic literature, emergence means the irreducibility of the properties of the whole to the characteristics of its parts. Two arguments have been advanced. First, the dysfunctional character of moral communication has been traced back to the emergent character of many moral problems. Moral communication has thus been shown to be not inherently dysfunctional, but rather needful of semantic forms that take account of the emergent properties of the economic and other social systems. Second, these properties highlight the moral aspect of the precariousness of system–environment relations as seen by Luhmann. As a moral problem, this precariousness can be resolved through greater sensitivity of social systems to their environment, social and natural alike. Accordingly, the emergent properties of the economic and other social systems can be captured by recasting the concept of responsibility as the individual-level or organizational-level projection of the environmental sensitivity of these systems.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 610
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Ariyadasa E(2015)Quality of life of Sri Lankan children: participatory action research to address the governance issues of voluntary children’s homes Syst Pract Action Res 28 453-478
[2]  
McIntyre-Mills J(2014)Commitment strategies for sustainability: how business firms can transform trade-offs into win–win outcomes Bus Strategy Environ 23 18-37
[3]  
Beckmann M(1960)The problem of social cost J Law Econ 3 1-44
[4]  
Hielscher S(1998)Niklas Luhmann’s theory as a challenge for ethics Ethical Theory Moral Pract 1 85-102
[5]  
Pies I(1975)Five propositions for social responsibility Bus Horiz 18 19-24
[6]  
Coase RH(2014)The relevance of systems thinking in the quest for multifinal social enterprises Syst Pract Action Res 27 593-606
[7]  
Dallmann H-U(2014)Trust and arena size: expectations, institutions, and general trust, and critical population and group sizes J Inst Econ 10 107-134
[8]  
Davis K(1997)Explaining emergence: towards an ontology of levels J Gen Philos Sci 28 83-117
[9]  
Dzombak R(2014)Participation versus consent: should corporations be run according to democratic principles? Bus Ethics Q 24 533-563
[10]  
Mehta C(2016)Foreseeing the dynamics of strategy: an anticipatory systems perspective Syst Pract Action Res 29 1-25