A Multitrait–Multimethod Analysis of the Construct Validity of Child Anxiety Disorders in a Clinical Sample

被引:0
作者
David A. Langer
Jeffrey J. Wood
R. Lindsey Bergman
John C. Piacentini
机构
[1] Harvard University,Judge Baker Children’s Center, Harvard Medical School, Department of Psychology
[2] University of California—Los Angeles,Department of Education
[3] University of California—Los Angeles,Department of Psychiatry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior
来源
Child Psychiatry & Human Development | 2010年 / 41卷
关键词
Anxiety; Parent–child agreement; Construct validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study examines the construct validity of separation anxiety disorder (SAD), social phobia (SoP), panic disorder (PD), and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) in a clinical sample of children. Participants were 174 children, 6 to 17 years old (94 boys) who had undergone a diagnostic evaluation at a university hospital based clinic. Parent and child ratings of symptom severity were assessed using the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC). Diagnostician ratings were obtained from the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children and Parents (ADIS: C/P). Discriminant and convergent validity were assessed using confirmatory factor analytic techniques to test a multitrait–multimethod model. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the current classification of these child anxiety disorders. The disorders demonstrated statistical independence from each other (discriminant validity of traits), the model fit better when the anxiety syndromes were specified than when no specific syndromes were specified (convergent validity), and the methods of assessment yielded distinguishable, unique types of information about child anxiety (discriminant validity of methods). Using a multi-informant approach, these findings support the distinctions between childhood anxiety disorders as delineated in the current classification system, suggesting that disagreement between informants in psychometric studies of child anxiety measures is not due to poor construct validity of these anxiety syndromes.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 561
页数:12
相关论文
共 112 条
[21]  
Barrios V(2007)Inter-rater reliability of the anxiety disorders interview schedule for dsm-iv: child and parent version J Am Acad Child Psych 46 731-1101
[22]  
Spence SH(1989)Reliability of anxiety assessment.1. Diagnostic agreement Arch Gen Psychiat 46 1093-565
[23]  
Ferdinand RF(1997)The multidimensional anxiety scale for children (masc): factor structure, reliability, and validity J Am Acad Child Psych 36 554-260
[24]  
Bongers IL(2007)Reliability and validity of parent and child versions of the multidimensional anxiety scale for children in community samples J Am Acad Child Psych 46 252-760
[25]  
van der Ende J(2004)Generalized anxiety disorder in referred children and adolescents J Am Acad Child Psych 43 752-91
[26]  
van Gastel W(2000)Rites, wrongs, and gold in model testing Struct Equ Modeling 7 82-964
[27]  
Tick N(2003)Childhood anxiety disorders: Parent-child (dis) agreement using a structured interview for the dsm-iv J Am Acad Child Psych 42 957-307
[28]  
Utens E(1991)Dilemmas in the pathway of the dsm-iv J Abnorm Psychol 100 302-190
[29]  
Silverman WK(2002)The tripartite model and dimensions of anxiety and depression: an examination of structure in a large school sample J Abnorm Child Psych 30 177-310
[30]  
Saavedra LM(2000)Relations of tripartite dimensions of emotion to childhood anxiety and mood disorders J Abnorm Child Psych 28 299-833