The clinical role of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in women with suspected coronary artery disease

被引:1
作者
Mieres J.H. [1 ]
Rosman D.R. [1 ]
Shaw L.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] North Shore University Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Manhasset, NY 11030
关键词
Myocardial Perfusion; Myocardial Perfusion Imaging; Nuclear Cardiology; Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy; Diabetic Woman;
D O I
10.1007/s11886-004-0062-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cardiovascular disease remains the number one cause of mortality for women in the United States, with coronary artery disease (CAD) accounting for 54% of all cardiovascular deaths. CAD claims the lives of more than 250,000 women each year and is therefore the single largest killer of American women. For several decades, the under-representation of women in clinical trials led to both a lack of available sex-specific evidence and a generalized misconception that CAD was a "man's disease." In actuality, not only are women vulnerable to CAD, they typically develop it 10 to 15 years later than men. Furthermore, sex differences exist in the mortality rates of women and men with CAD, such that once CAD is present in women, they have worse outcomes than their male counterparts. Consequently, early and accurate diagnosis of CAD is crucial for reducing mortality rates in women. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using contemporary techniques has been shown to have significant value in the diagnosis and prognosis of CAD in women. In the risk assessment of women with an intermediate clinical pretest likelihood of CAD, using MPI with exercise or pharmacologic stress has been shown to add incremental value to clinical variables or exercise electrocardiogram stress testing alone. This review discusses the clinical role of stress MPI in the management of women with suspected CAD. Copyright © 2004 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 31
页数:4
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] 2003 Heart and Stroke Statistical Update, (2003)
  • [2] Shaw L.J., Miller D.D., Romeis J.C., Et al., Gender differences in the noninvasive evaluation and management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease, Ann. Intern. Med., 120, pp. 556-559, (1994)
  • [3] Tobin J.N., Wassertheil-Smoller S., Wexler J.P., Et al., Sex bias in considering coronary bypass surgery, Ann. Intern. Med., 107, pp. 19-25, (1987)
  • [4] Douglas P.S., Ginsburg G.S., The evaluation of chest pain in women, N. Engl. J. Med., 334, pp. 1311-1315, (1996)
  • [5] Steingart R.M., Packer M., Hamm P., Et al., Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease, N. Engl. J. Med., 325, pp. 226-230, (1991)
  • [6] Kilaru P.K., Kelly R.F., Calvin J.E., Parillo J.E., Utilization of coronary angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction in men and women risk stratified by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart association guidelines, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 35, pp. 974-979, (2000)
  • [7] Mark D.B., Shaw L.K., Delong E.R., Et al., Absence of sex bias in the referral of patients for cardiac catheterization, N. Engl. J. Med., 330, pp. 1101-1106, (1994)
  • [8] Hochleitner M., Coronary heart disease: Sexual bias in referral for coronary angiogram. How does it work in a state-run health system?, J. Wom. Health Gen. Based Med., 9, pp. 29-34, (2000)
  • [9] Wong C.C., Froelicher E.S., Bacchetti P., Et al., Influence of gender on cardiovascular mortality in acute myocardial infarction patients with high indication for coronary angiography, Circulation, 96, (1997)
  • [10] Mosca L., Grundy S.M., Judelson D., Et al., AHA/ACC scientific statement: Consensus panel statement. Guide to preventive cardiology for women, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., 33, pp. 1751-1755, (1999)