Co-optimizing the value of storage in energy and regulation service markets

被引:14
作者
Anderson K. [1 ]
El Gamal A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 350 Serra Mall, Stanford, 94305, CA
关键词
Cash Flow; Regulation Service; Regulation Capability; Ancillary Service; Investment Horizon;
D O I
10.1007/s12667-016-0201-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We develop a methodology for maximizing the present value of an independently operated electric energy storage (EES) unit co-optimized to perform both energy arbitrage (EA) and regulation service (RS). While our methodology applies to all types of EES, it is particularly suitable for EES units with a finite cycle life and a high power-to-capacity ratio (e.g., grid-scale batteries). We first state the constraints of the EES that limit its ability to simultaneously provide both EA and RS and formulate a deterministic linear program to find the perfect price foresight value (PPFV) of co-optimized storage. Next, we develop the receding horizon with multi-stage forecasting (RHMF) controller, which is able to efficiently co-optimize storage across EA and RS in an online real world setting with price uncertainty. We apply this controller to two battery technologies using market data from the independent service operator of New England (ISONE). We find that RHMF significantly outperforms several simpler feasible benchmark controllers and comes close to the PPFV upper bound. We also find that co-optimizing these technologies across both EA and RS provides increased profits relative to pursuing these strategies independently. The case study demonstrates the utility of our method in understanding how storage technology parameters impact financial returns. © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 387
页数:18
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Anderson K., El Gamal A., Monetizable value of grid-scale EES in wholesale electricity markets, International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES’14). Accepted and Awaiting Publication, (2014)
[2]  
Maciejowski J., Predictive Control with Constraints, (2002)
[3]  
Bemporad A., Model predictive control design: new trends and tools, Proceedings of 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, p. 66786683, (2006)
[4]  
Figueiredo F.C., Flynn P.C., Cabral E.A., The economics of EES in 14 deregulated power markets, Energy Stud. Rev., 14, 131, (2006)
[5]  
Graves F., Jenkin T., Murphy D., Opportunities for electricity EES in deregulating markets, Electr. J., 12, (1999)
[6]  
Bradburya K., Pratsona L., Patio-Echeverrib D., Economic viability of EES systems based on price arbitrage potential in real-time U.S. electricity markets, Appl. Energy, 114, (2014)
[7]  
Sioshansi R., Denholm P., Jenkin T., Weiss J., Estimating the value of electricity EES in PJM: arbitrage and some welfare effects, Energy Econ., 31, 2, pp. 269-277, (2009)
[8]  
Sioshansi R., Denholm P., Jenkin T., A comparative analysis of the value of pure and hybrid electricity EES, Energy Econ., 33, (2011)
[9]  
Mokrian P., Stephen M., A stochastic programming framework for the valuation of electricity EES, 26th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference, USA, pp. 24-27, (2006)
[10]  
Walawalkar R., Apt J., Mancini R., Economics of electric EES for EA and regulation in New York, Energy Policy, 35, 4, (2007)