Self-adaptive polynomial mutation in NSGA-II

被引:0
作者
Jose L. Carles-Bou
Severino F. Galán
机构
[1] Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia UNED,Escuela Internacional de Doctorado EIDUNED
[2] UNED,Department of Artificial Intelligence
来源
Soft Computing | 2023年 / 27卷
关键词
Multi-objective evolutionary algorithm; NSGA-II; Polynomial mutation; Distribution index self-adaptation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization is a field that has experienced a rapid growth in the last two decades. Although an important number of new multi-objective evolutionary algorithms have been designed and implemented by the scientific community, the popular Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) remains as a widely used baseline for algorithm performance comparison purposes and applied to different engineering problems. Since every evolutionary algorithm needs several parameters to be set up in order to operate, parameter control constitutes a crucial task for obtaining an effective and efficient performance in its execution. However, despite the advancements in parameter control for evolutionary algorithms, NSGA-II has been mainly used in the literature with fine-tuned static parameters. This paper introduces a novel and computationally lightweight self-adaptation mechanism for controlling the distribution index parameter of the polynomial mutation operator usually employed by NSGA-II in particular and by multi-objective evolutionary algorithms in general. Additionally, the classical NSGA-II using polynomial mutation with a static distribution index is compared with this new version utilizing a self-adapted parameter. The experiments carried out over twenty-five benchmark problems show that the proposed modified NSGA-II with a self-adaptive mutator outperforms its static counterpart in more than 75% of the problems using three quality metrics (hypervolume, generalized spread, and modified inverted generational distance).
引用
收藏
页码:17711 / 17727
页数:16
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]  
Aleti A(2016)A systematic literature review of adaptive parameter control methods for evolutionary algorithms ACM Comput Surv (CSUR) 49 1-35
[2]  
Moser I(2020)Performance indicators in multiobjective optimization Eur J Oper Res 292 397-422
[3]  
Audet C(2011)HypE: an algorithm for fast hypervolume-based many-objective optimization Evol Comput 19 45-76
[4]  
Bigeon J(2003)The balance between proximity and diversity in multiobjective evolutionary algorithms IEEE Trans Evol Comput 3 124-141
[5]  
Cartier D(1999)Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms IEEE Trans Evol Comput 478 499-523
[6]  
Digabel SL(2019)A hybrid GSA-GA algorithm for constrained optimization problems Inf Sci 16 122-128
[7]  
Salomon L(1986)Optimization of control parameters for genetic algorithms IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 10 390-216
[8]  
Bader J(2019)Choosing mutation and crossover ratios for genetic algorithms-a review with a new dynamic approach Information 24 201-223
[9]  
Zitzler E(2020)A survey of automatic parameter tuning methods for metaheuristics IEEE Trans Evol Comput 7 204-440
[10]  
Bosman PAN (2022)Online algorithm configuration for differential evolution algorithm Appl Intell 26 411-2404