Patterns of relapse and progression in multiple myeloma patients after auto-SCT: implications for patients’ monitoring after transplantation

被引:0
作者
D Zamarin
S Giralt
H Landau
N Lendvai
A Lesokhin
D Chung
G Koehne
D Chimento
S M Devlin
E Riedel
M Bhutani
D Babu
H Hassoun
机构
[1] Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medicine
[2] Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
[3] Weill Cornell Medical College,Department of Medical Oncology Branch
[4] NCI,Department of Internal Medicine
[5] National Institutes of Health,undefined
[6] St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Hospital Center,undefined
[7] Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons,undefined
[8] Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weil Cornell Medical School,undefined
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2013年 / 48卷
关键词
multiple myeloma; autologous transplantation; relapse; free light chain assay;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Auto-SCT (ASCT) is widely used in first-line treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). However, most patients eventually relapse or have progression of disease (R/POD). Although precise knowledge of R/POD patterns would be important to generate evidence-based surveillance recommendations after ASCT, such data is limited in the literature, especially after introduction of the free light chain assay (FLCA). This retrospective study examined the patterns of R/POD after first-line ASCT in 273 patients, using established criteria. At the time of R/POD, only 2% of patients had no associated serological evidence of R/POD. A total of 85% had asymptomatic R/POD, first detected by serological testing, whereas 15% had symptomatic R/POD with aggressive disease, early R/POD and short survival, with poor cytogenetics and younger age identified as risk factors. Although occult skeletal lesions were found in 40% of asymptomatic patients tested following serological R/POD, yearly skeletal surveys and urine testing were poor at heralding R/POD. We found a consistent association between paraprotein types at diagnosis and R/POD, allowing informed recommendations for appropriate serological monitoring and propose a new needed criterion using FLCA for patients relapsing by FLC only. Our findings provide important evidence-based recommendations that strengthen current monitoring guidelines after first-line ASCT in MM.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 424
页数:5
相关论文
共 132 条
  • [1] Cavo M(2011)International Myeloma Working Group consensus approach to the treatment of multiple myeloma patients who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation Blood 117 6063-6073
  • [2] Rajkumar SV(2010)European Myeloma Network: the 3rd Trialist Forum Consensus Statement from the European experts meeting on multiple myeloma Leuk Lymphoma 51 2006-2011
  • [3] Palumbo A(2009)NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: multiple myeloma J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7 908-942
  • [4] Moreau P(2009)Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 360 2645-2654
  • [5] Orlowski R(2011)Multiple myeloma N Engl J Med 364 1046-1060
  • [6] Blade J(2011)Thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib in the management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma Expert Rev Hematol 4 51-60
  • [7] Engelhardt M(2011)Multiple myeloma Annu Rev Med 62 249-264
  • [8] Udi J(2001)Highly sensitive, automated immunoassay for immunoglobulin free light chains in serum and urine Clin Chem 47 673-680
  • [9] Kleber M(2009)International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders Leukemia 23 215-224
  • [10] Spencer A(2002)Serum reference intervals and diagnostic ranges for free kappa and free lambda immunoglobulin light chains: relative sensitivity for detection of monoclonal light chains Clin Chem 48 1437-1444