Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: long-term evolution after sequential therapy

被引:0
作者
Antonia Peña
Juan Bravo
Marta Melgosa
Carlota Fernandez
Carmen Meseguer
Laura Espinosa
Angel Alonso
M. Luz Picazo
Mercedes Navarro
机构
[1] Hospital Infantil La Paz,Nefrología
[2] Hospital Universitario La Paz,Department of Pathology
来源
Pediatric Nephrology | 2007年 / 22卷
关键词
Steroid-resistant nephritic syndrome; Pulses; Methylprednisolone; Cyclosporine; Tacrolimus; Mycophenolate mofetil; Children;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We present a retrospective study of 30 children of mean age 3.02 ± 1.81 years with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) treated with intravenous injection of methylprednisolone plus orally administered prednisone; 24 children also received cyclophosphamide (CP). Sixteen were resistant to steroids from the beginning, and 14 after a mean of 11.26 ± 16.61 months. The initial histological diagnosis was: 18 minimal change disease (MCD), 11 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and one diffuse mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis (DMPG). Total remission was achieved in 22 patients (73.3%), partial response in three (10%) and no response in five (16.6%), two of whom were brothers carrying an NPHS2 gene double mutation. There was no difference in response between the MCD and FSGS patients; the only patient with DMPG did not respond. Only initial resistance was a sign of bad prognosis. At follow-up (6.4 ± 3.6 years from last pulse), 21/22 were still in remission, 14/21 were without treatment. Six patients required cyclosporine or mycophenolate mofetil because of steroid dependence. Two non-responders developed end-stage renal failure (ESRF); the remaining patients maintained normal glomerular filtration. The treatment was well tolerated. In conclusion, most of the patients treated with sequential therapy consisting of methylprednisolone (MP) (100%) and CP (80%) showed remission and preserved renal function, but 20% developed steroid dependence.
引用
收藏
页码:1875 / 1880
页数:5
相关论文
共 215 条
  • [1] Koskimies O(1982)Long-term outcome of primary nephrotic syndrome Arch Dis Child 57 544-548
  • [2] Vilska J(1998)Long-term outcome in children and adults with classic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis Am J Kidney Dis 32 72-79
  • [3] Rapola J(1996)Cyclophosphamide does not benefit patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. A report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children Pediatr Nephrol 10 590-593
  • [4] Hallman N(1985)Morphological transition in minimal change nephrotic syndrome Nephron 39 157-159
  • [5] Cattran DC(1983)Long-term evaluation of children with nephrotic syndrome and focal segmental glomerular sclerosis Nephron 35 225-231
  • [6] Rao P(1990)Treatment of steroid-resistant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis with pulse methylprednisolone and alkylating agents Pediatr Nephrol 4 303-307
  • [7] Tarshish P(1981)The treatment of severe glomerulopathies in children using high dose intravenous methylprednisolone pulses Am J Kidney Dis 1 148-156
  • [8] Tobin JN(1997)Prognostic significance of the early course of minimal change nephrotic syndrome: report of the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children J Am Soc Nephrol 8 769-776
  • [9] Bernstein J(2003)Intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide—is it effective in children with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome? Pediatr Nephrol 18 1143-1146
  • [10] Edelmann CM(2001)Treatment of focal glomerulosclerosis with pulse steroids and oral cyclophosphamide Pediatr Nephrol 16 901-905