Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral domain optical coherence tomography and swept source optical coherence tomography in children

被引:0
作者
Chun On Lee
Xiujuan Zhang
Nan Yuan
Shumin Tang
Li Jia Chen
Carol Y. Cheung
Jason C. Yam
机构
[1] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
[2] Prince of Wales Hospital,Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
[3] Hong Kong Eye Hospital,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 11卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Choroidal thickness is associated with many ocular conditions, interchangeability among different generations of optical coherence tomography is therefore important for both research purpose and clinical application. Hence, we compared choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) in healthy paediatric eyes. A total of 114 children from the population-based Hong Kong Children Eye Study with mean age of 7.38 ± 0.82 years were included. Choroidal thickness of the right eye was measured by both devices. The central foveal choroidal thickness (CFCT) measured by SD-OCT and SS-OCT was 273.24 ± 54.29 μm and 251.84 ± 47.12 μm respectively. Inter-device correlation coefficient was 0.840 (95% CI 0.616–0.918). However, choroidal thickness obtained by SD-OCT was significantly thicker than that measured by SS-OCT with a mean difference of 21.40 ± 33.13 μm (P < 0.001). Bland–Altman limit of agreement on the relative difference scale for SD-OCT/SS-OCT was 86.33 μm. Validated conversion equation for translating SD-OCT CFCT measurement into SS-OCT was SS-OCT = 35.261 + 0.810 × SD-OCT. In conclusion, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) shows an acceptable agreement between SD-OCT and SS-OCT, however, there was a significant inter-device difference of choroidal thickness measurements in normal children eyes. Therefore, the measurements are not interchangeable.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 190 条
[1]  
Nickla DL(2010)The multifunctional choroid Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 29 144-168
[2]  
Wallman J(2018)Choroidal changes in human myopia: Insights from optical coherence tomography imaging Clin. Exp. Optom. 102 270-285
[3]  
Read SA(2009)Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in highly myopic eyes Am. J. Ophthalmol. 148 445-450
[4]  
Fuss JA(2013)Choroidal thickness in myopic and nonmyopic children assessed with enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 7578-7586
[5]  
Vincent SJ(2017)Comparison between spectral-domain and swept-source optical coherence tomography angiographic imaging of choroidal neovascularization Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58 1499-1505
[6]  
Collins MJ(2016)Advances of optical coherence tomography in myopia and pathologic myopia Eye 30 901-500
[7]  
Alonso-Caneiro D(2008)Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography Am. J. Ophthalmol. 146 496-1281 e1271
[8]  
Fujiwara T(2014)Choroidal analysis in healthy eyes using swept-source optical coherence tomography compared to spectral domain optical coherence tomography Am. J. Ophthalmol. 157 1272-338
[9]  
Imamura Y(2014)Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes Br. J. Ophthalmol. 98 334-7636
[10]  
Margolis R(2013)Comparisons of choroidal thickness of normal eyes obtained by two different spectral-domain OCT instruments and one swept-source OCT instrument Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54 7630-358