Treat to Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Updated Review of Literature

被引:23
作者
Umar Darr
Nabeel Khan
机构
[1] University of Toledo Medical Center,Department of Gastroenterology
[2] University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine,undefined
关键词
Treat to target; Crohn’s disease; Ulcerative colitis; Inflammatory bowel disease;
D O I
10.1007/s11938-017-0130-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Therapeutic management of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) has, for years, been tailored towards monitoring patient clinical presentation as a way to gauge therapeutic management. With the advent of newer biological agents, treatment and management have begun to focus on more objective rather than subjective parameters. These objective parameters include endoscopic targets and focus on the impact of mucosal healing, radiologic and histologic targets, patient reported outcomes, and use of non-invasive biomarkers. However, a recent consensus statement has identified clinical/patient-reported outcome (PRO) remission and endoscopic remission (defined as a Mayo endoscopic subscore of 0–1) as the target for UC with histological remission being an adjunctive goal. For CD, clinical/PRO remission defined as resolution of abdominal pain and diarrhea/altered bowel habit and endoscopic remission, defined as resolution of ulceration at ileocolonoscopy, and resolution of findings of inflammation on cross-sectional imaging in patients who cannot be adequately assessed with ileocolonoscopy were the primary targets. Biomarker remission (normal C-reactive protein (CRP) and calprotectin) was considered as an adjunctive target. This approach requires continuous monitoring and therapeutic adjustments with an aim to achieve the target. This article attempts to review the most updated literature regarding the treat to target approach and thus provides current recommendations and supported evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 125
页数:9
相关论文
共 189 条
[1]  
Ordas I(2012)Ulcerative colitis Lancet 380 1606-1619
[2]  
Eckmann L(2012)Crohn’s disease Lancet 380 1590-1605
[3]  
Talamini M(2014)Have biologics changed the natural history of Crohn’s disease Dig Dis 32 351-359
[4]  
Baumgart DC(2015)Treat to target: a proposed new paradigm for the management of Crohn’s disease Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 13 1042-1015
[5]  
Sandborn WJ(2013)Clinical prognostic factors for disabling Crohn’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis World J Gastroenterol 19 3866-3871
[6]  
Mandel MD(2006)Predictors of Crohn’s disease Gastroenterology 130 650-656
[7]  
Miheller P(2008)Predictors of severe Crohn’s disease Scand J Gastroenterol 43 948-954
[8]  
Mullner K(2011)Risk factors that predict the requirement of aggressive therapy among Chinese patients with Crohn’s disease J Dig Dis 12 99-104
[9]  
Golovics PA(2009)Perianal disease, small bowel disease, smoking, prior steroid or early azathioprine/biological therapy are predictors of disease behavior change in patients with Crohn’s disease World J Gastroenterol 15 3504-3510
[10]  
Lakatos PL(2012)Decreasing risk of colorectal cancer in patients with inflammatory bowel disease over 30 years Gastroenterology 143 375-81, e1