Candida Colonization and Candiduria in Critically Ill Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

被引:0
作者
Pierluigi Viale
机构
[1] University of Udine,Department of Medical and Morphological Research, Medical School, Clinic of Infectious Diseases
来源
Drugs | 2009年 / 69卷
关键词
Intensive Care Unit; Fluconazole; Intensive Care Unit Patient; Invasive Disease; Invasive Candidiasis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Clinical severity of invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients and existing difficulties in timely diagnosis mean that early empirical therapy, based upon a strict clinical and epidemiological judgement, is required in intensive care unit patients. One school of thought is that the clinical severity and epidemiological burden of this disease warrant prophylaxis in all critically ill patients. In reality, however, there are still many open-ended questions with regard to which variables are most apt for selection of patients requiring prophylactic or empirical treatment. As a consequence of a consistently significant correlation between colonization (one or more Candida-positive cultures from non-sterile sites) and subsequent infection, colonization remains the most universally accepted predictive variable with regard to invasive candidiasis. This is particularly true for high density colonization. It has not yet been clarified whether colonization can be used in isolation to identify high-risk patients or if it should be combined with other variables indicating high risk. Additionally, there is still a debate surrounding the question as to whether determination of multisite colonization is required, or whether detecting colonization at one or two specific sites is sufficient for the identification of high-risk patients. From a practical perspective, candiduria (a frequent finding in critically ill patients) appears one of the most promising parameters with regard to single-site assessment, owing to easy sampling procedures. Definitive evidence of a correlation between candiduria and invasive candidiasis is currently still lacking, as the few published studies thus far have yielded conflicting results. It is, however, apparent that candiduria can be reliably considered a surrogate marker of high density of colonization, thereby potentially representing a more practical, less resource-intensive screening marker of heavy colonization and high risk of infection than is currently possible using parameters such as the multiple-site colonization index.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Ellis M(2001)Invasive fungal infections: evolving challenges for diagnosis and treatment Mol Immunol 28 947-57
[2]  
Guery BP(2009)Management of invasive candidiasis and candidemia in adult non-neutropenic intensive care unit patients: part I Epidemiology and Diagnosis Intensive Care Med 35 55-62
[3]  
Arendrup MC(2008)A prospective clinical trial of a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the diagnosis of candidemia in nonneutropenic, critically ill adults Clin Infect Dis 46 890-6
[4]  
Auzinger G(2008)Empirical fluconazole versus placebo for intensive care unit patients: a randomized trial Ann Intern Med 149 83-90
[5]  
McMullan R(2005)Delaying the empiric treatment of Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49 3640-5
[6]  
Metwally L(2006) bloodstream infection until positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality Clin Infect Dis 43 25-31
[7]  
Coyle PV(2007)Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study J Antimicrob Chemother 60 613-8
[8]  
Schuster MG(2002)Adequacy of empirical antifungal therapy and effect on outcome among patients with invasive Am J Med 113 480-5
[9]  
Edwards JE(2000) species infections Infect Dis Clin Pract 9 169-75
[10]  
Sobel JD(2001)Effects of nosocomial candidemia on outcomes of critically ill patients Ann Surg 233 542-8