Fish-farming and the precautionary principle: Context and values in environmental science for policy

被引:0
作者
Kaiser M. [1 ]
机构
[1] National Committee for Research Ethics in Science and Technology
关键词
Environmental rationality; Environmental values; Precautionary principle; Risk aversion; Risk perceptions; Science for Policy; Scientific responsibility;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009679923315
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper starts with the assumption that the Precautionary Principle (PP) is one of the most important elements of the concept of sustainability. It is noted that PP has entered international treaties and national law. PP is widely referred to as a central principle of environmental policy. However, the precise content of PP remains largely unclear. In particular it seems unclear how PP relates to science. In section 2 of the paper a general overview of some historical and systematic features of PP are presented. In section 3 a specific case is discussed in greater detail. It is claimed that the escape of farmed salmon from fish cages in the Sea, and its eventual invasion of the breeding places of the wild salmon up the rivers, must be regarded a proper case for applying PP. Yet there is no single PP-strategy. Instead, four different strategies are presented, and all of them can be regarded precautionary strategies in the light of PP. The choice between these strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 341
页数:34
相关论文
共 36 条
[11]  
Hanson S.O., The Detection Level, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 22, pp. 103-109, (1995)
[12]  
Hanson S.O., Can We Reverse the Burden of Proof, Toxicology Letters, (1997)
[13]  
Hutchings J.A., The Threat of Extinction to Native Populations Experiencing Spawning Intrusions by Cultured Atlantic Salmon, Aquaculture, 98, pp. 119-132, (1991)
[14]  
Johnson E.J., Tversky A., Representations of Perceptions of Risk, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, pp. 55-70, (1980)
[15]  
Johnston P., Simmonds M., Green Light for Precautionary Science, New Scientist, 3, (1991)
[16]  
Sustainable Development: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy, (1995)
[17]  
Lindell M.K., Earle T.C., How Close is Close Enough? Public Perceptions of industrial Facilities, Risk Analysis, 3, pp. 245-254, (1983)
[18]  
Lindsay R., Galloping Gertie and the Precautionary Principle: How is Environmental Impact Assessed?, Science for the Earth, (1995)
[19]  
Acceptable Evidence, (1991)
[20]  
Milne A., The perils of green pessimism, New Scientist, 12 JUNE, pp. 34-37, (1993)