are area studies diversifying european political science? perspectives from germany and portugal

被引:0
作者
monica rodriguez de luna
机构
[1] Universität Hamburg,Institute of Political Science
来源
European Political Science | 2016年 / 15卷
关键词
diversity; European political science; area studies; Portugal; Germany;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Area Studies, that is, academic work focused on a specific geographic area and its phenomena, exists in the form of study programmes, institutes and departments in many European universities and research centres. European political scientists preoccupied with theoretical abstraction have also engaged, within the frame of Area Studies, with the production of context-rich knowledge. Although Area Studies have followed distinctive and non-linear paths of development, this approach to the study of social science is present in a considerable number of academic spaces in Europe. A debate on the value of Area Studies is also active in the context of a discussion on its capacity to dismantle ethnocentrism in science. Despite the dynamism of this discussion, little has been done to explore empirically how Area Studies have contributed or not to the diversification of Political Science. This paper seeks to remedy that omission and analyse whether an Area Studies approach to the study of Political Science, in particular, European Political Science, has contributed or not to making the discipline more diverse. To address this question, the paper presents some considerations that emerge from a review of the literature and from interviews with twenty researchers working in the field of Political Science in two European countries: Germany and Portugal.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 535
页数:16
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Cancela J(2014)Political research in Portugal: scientific articles in national academic journals European Political Science 13 327-339
  • [2] Dias Coelho T(1998)Globalization and area studies: When is too broad too narrow? Chronicle of Higher Education 40 114-115
  • [3] Ruivo J(2016)Recherche et extraversion: éléments pour une sociologie de la science dans les pays de la périphérie Africa Development 15 149-158
  • [4] Hall P(2003)Letter from the President: The role of cross-regional comparison Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section in Comparative Politics 14 1-6
  • [5] Tarrow S(1997)Preconception versus observation, or the contributions of rational choice theory and area studies to contemporary political science Political Science & Politics 30 170-174
  • [6] Hountondji P(1996)Posoccidentalismo: las epistemologías fronterizas y el dilema de los estudios (latinoamericanos) de área Revista iberoamericana 62 679-696
  • [7] Huber E(2002)The geopolitics of knowledge and the colonial difference South Atlantic Quarterly 101 57-96
  • [8] Johnson C(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [9] Mignolo WD(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [10] Mignolo WD(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined