Sustained accuracy improvement in intraocular lens power calculation with the application of quality control circle

被引:0
作者
Lei Lin
Pingjun Chang
Jialu Xie
Zhangliang Li
Hongfang Zhang
Fan Lu
Yun-e Zhao
机构
[1] School of Ophthalmology and Optometry,
[2] Eye Hospital,undefined
[3] Wenzhou Medical University,undefined
[4] Wenzhou,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 7卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation is always a challenge in ophthalmology, and unoptimized process may lead to inaccurate refractive outcomes. Quality control circle (QCC) has shown its success in many fields as a process management tool. However, its efficacy in ophthalmology remains unclear. Here we utilized the QCC method to optimize the process and evaluate its efficacy in improving the accuracy of IOL power calculation. After the QCC application, the percentage of eyes with achieved refractive outcomes within 0.5 diopter significantly increased from 63.2% to 80.8% calculated by Haigis formula and 59.2% to 75.8% by SRK/T formula in patients with normal axial length (AL) (22 mm ≤ AL < 26 mm). Although there were no statistically significant differences in patients with long AL by the two formulas (p = 0.886 and 0.726), we achieved an accuracy of 75% with the application of the PhacoOptics software, which was significantly higher than that using the other two formulas (p < 0.001). Our findings indicated that QCC optimized and standardized the process of IOL power calculation, thus improved the accuracy of IOL power calculation in patients who underwent cataract surgery.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Olsen T(2007)Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica 85 472-485
  • [2] Gale RP(2009)Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery Eye (London, England) 23 149-152
  • [3] Saldana M(2017)Accuracy of 3 new methods for intraocular lens power selection Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 43 333-339
  • [4] Johnston RL(2016)Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 42 1157-1164
  • [5] Zuberbuhler B(2011)Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 37 63-71
  • [6] McKibbin M(2011)Optimizing intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial lengths above 25.0 mm Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 37 2018-2027
  • [7] Kane JX(2015)Precision medicine for metastatic breast cancer–limitations and solutions Nature reviews. Clinical oncology 12 693-704
  • [8] Van Heerden A(2015)A new initiative on precision medicine The New England journal of medicine 372 793-795
  • [9] Atik A(2010)Translating cancer research into targeted therapeutics Nature 467 543-549
  • [10] Petsoglou C(2017)Intraoperative aberrometry versus preoperative biometry for intraocular lens power selection in axial myopia Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 43 505-510