Exploring an intelligent tutoring system as a conversation-based assessment tool for reading comprehension

被引:0
作者
Shi G. [1 ]
Lippert A.M. [1 ]
Shubeck K. [1 ]
Fang Y. [1 ]
Chen S. [1 ]
Pavlik P., Jr. [1 ]
Greenberg D. [2 ]
Graesser A.C. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Memphis, Memphis, 38152, TN
[2] Georgia State University Atlanta, Atlanta, 30302, GA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Adult readers; Assessment; AutoTutor; Intelligent tutoring systems; Reading comprehension;
D O I
10.1007/s41237-018-0065-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Reading comprehension is often assessed by having students read passages and administering a test that assesses their understanding of the text. Shorter assessments may fail to give a full picture of comprehension ability while more thorough ones can be time consuming and costly. This study used data from a conversational intelligent tutoring system (AutoTutor) to assess reading comprehension ability in 52 low-literacy adults who interacted with the system. We analyzed participants’ accuracy and time spent answering questions in conversations in lessons that targeted four theoretical components of comprehension: Word, Textbase, Situation Model, and Rhetorical Structure. Accuracy and answer response time were analyzed to track adults’ proficiency for comprehension components, and we analyzed whether the four components predicted reading grade level. We discuss the results with respect to the advantages that a conversational intelligent tutoring system assessment may provide over traditional assessment tools and the linking of theory to practice in adult literacy. © 2018, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 633
页数:18
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [41] Zapata-Rivera D., Jackson T., Katz I.R., Authoring conversation-based assessment scenarios, Design recommendations for intelligent tutoring systems: authoring tools, 3, pp. 191-200, (2015)
  • [42] Zwaan R.A., Radvansky G.A., Situation models in language comprehension and memory, Psychol Bull, 123, 2, pp. 162-185, (1998)
  • [43] Zwaan R.A., Magliano J.P., Graesser A.C., Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension, J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 21, 2, pp. 386-397, (1995)