Effect of benazepril addition to amlodipine on ankle oedema and subcutaneous tissue pressure in hypertensive patients

被引:0
作者
R Fogari
G D Malamani
A Zoppi
A Mugellini
A Rinaldi
A Vanasia
P Preti
机构
[1] Clinica Medica,Dipartimento di Medicina Interna
[2] IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo,undefined
[3] Università di Pavia,undefined
来源
Journal of Human Hypertension | 2003年 / 17卷
关键词
benazepril; amlodipine; ankle oedema;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of benazepril addition to amlodipine antihypertensive treatment on ankle–foot volume (AFV) and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure (PSTP), two objective measures of ankle oedema. A total of 32 mild to moderate essential hypertensives (DBP>90 and <110 mmHg), aged 30–70 years were studied. After a 4-week placebo period, they were randomized to amlodipine 5 mg o.d. or benazepril 10 mg o.d. or amlodipine 5 mg plus benazepril 10 mg o.d. for 4 weeks, according to a crossover design. At the end of the placebo period and of each active treatment period, blood pressure,AFV and PSTP were evaluated. AFV was measured using the principle of water displacement. PSTP was assessed using a system, the subcutaneous pretibial interstitial enviroment with a water manometer. Both amlodipine and benazepril monotherapy significantly reduced SBP (−18.2±4 and −17.8±4 mmHg, respectively, P<0.01 vs baseline) and DBP (−12.1±3 and −11.7±3 mmHg, respectively, P<0.01); the reduction was increased by the combination (−24.2±5 mmHg for SBP, P<0.001 and −16.8±4 mmHg for DBP, P<0.001). Amlodipine monotherapy significantly increased both AFV (+17.1%, P<0.001 vs baseline) and PSTP (+56.6%, P<0.001 vs baseline). As compared to amlodipine alone, the combination produced a less pronounced increase in AFV (+5.5%, P<0.05 vs baseline and P<0.01 vs amlodipine) and PSTP (+20.5%, P<0.05 vs baseline and P<0.01 vs amlodipine). Ankle oedema was clinically evident in 11 patients with amlodipine monotherapy and in three patients with the combination. These results suggest that ACE-inhibitors partially counteract the microcirculatory changes responsible for Ca-antagonists-induced oedema formation.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 212
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Materson BJ(1993)Single drug therapy for hypertension in men N Engl J Med 328 914-921
  • [2] Sica DA(1994)Fixed-dose combination antihypertensive drugs. Do they have a role in rational therapy? Drugs 48 16-24
  • [3] Waeber B(1997)Combination antihypertensive therapy: does it have a role in rational therapy? Am J Hypertens 10 131S-137S
  • [4] Brunner HR(1999)Combinations in the treatment of hypertension: ACE-inhibitors and Calcium-antagonists Am J Hypertens 12 868-908
  • [5] Messerli FH(2001)Low-dose combination therapy: the rationalization for an ACE inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker in higher risk patients Am J Hypertens 14 8S-11S
  • [6] Kaplan NM(1984)Calcium channel blockade with nifedipine and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition with captopril in the therapy of patients with severe primary hypertension Circulation 80 279-284
  • [7] Guazzi MD(1996)Treatment of patients with essential hypertension: amlodipine 5 mg/benazepril 20 mg compared with amlodipine 5 mg, benazepril 20 mg and placebo Clin Ther 18 1213-1223
  • [8] Kuschnir E(1997)for the Enalapril-Felodipine ER Factorial Study Group (1997). Combined enalapril and felodipine extended release (ER) for systemic hypertension Am J Cardiol 79 431-435
  • [9] Acuna E(2000)Comparison of efficacy and side effects of combination therapy of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (benazepril) with calcium antagonist (either nifedipine or amlodipine) versus high dose calcium antagonist monotherapy for systemic hypertension Am J Cardiol 86 1182-1187
  • [10] Sevilla D(1987)Microvascular mechanisms involved in calcium antagonist edema formation J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 10 S121-S131