A conceptual framework for integrating mathematics and science in the secondary classroom

被引:0
作者
Páraic Treacy
机构
[1] Curriculum & Instruction Division, Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi
来源
SN Social Sciences | / 1卷 / 6期
关键词
Applications of mathematics; Integrated pedagogy; Rich tasks; Science inquiry; Transdisciplinary lessons;
D O I
10.1007/s43545-021-00166-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article presents a theoretical model for integrating mathematics and science in the secondary classroom. This model, Authentic Integration of Mathematics and Science (AIMS), promotes engagement with rich tasks which combine topics from mathematics and science to enable enhanced learning through structured inquiry, dialogue, and application of knowledge and skills from both subjects to relatable tasks. It is argued that this model will provide opportunities for students to retrieve previously learned material and explore key concepts from both disciplines in tandem, thereby strengthening retention and understanding. Application of this model should also support the enhancement of students’ problem-solving skills and the facilitation of meaningful applications of mathematics to other disciplines in a sustainable manner. Attempts to integrate mathematics and science in the classroom are widely recommended but often encounter barriers such as deficiencies in teacher knowledge of their non-specialist subject, the inflexible nature of school timetables, and a dearth of instructional materials, amongst other issues. Lesson study is proposed as an effective means for operationalising the AIMS model and providing a framework which accounts for these barriers and allows for consistent implementation in tandem with single-subject instruction. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
An S.A., Preservice teachers’ knowledge of interdisciplinary pedagogy: the case of elementary mathematics–science integrated lessons, ZDM Math Educ, 49, 2, pp. 237-248, (2017)
[2]  
Alexander R.J., Towards dialogic teaching: rethinking classroom talk, (2017)
[3]  
Alexander R., Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial, Res Pap Educ, 33, 5, pp. 561-598, (2018)
[4]  
Anderson L.W., Krathwohl D.R., Airasian P., Cruikshank K., Mayer R., Pintrich P., Raths J., Wittrock M., A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy, (2001)
[5]  
Becker K., Park K., Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students' learning: a preliminary meta-analysis, J STEM Educ Innov Res, 12, 56, pp. 23-37, (2011)
[6]  
Beswick K., Fraser S., Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts, ZDM Math Educ, 51, 6, pp. 955-965, (2019)
[7]  
Cairns D., Areepattamannil S., Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries, Res Sci Educ, 49, 1, pp. 1-23, (2019)
[8]  
Cepeda N.J., Pashler H., Vul E., Wixted J.T., Rohrer D., Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: a review and quantitative synthesis, Psychol Bull, 132, 3, pp. 354-380, (2006)
[9]  
Cooper G., Sweller J., Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer, J Educ Psychol, 79, pp. 347-362, (1987)
[10]  
Day S.B., Goldstone R.L., The import of knowledge export: connecting findings and theories of transfer of learning, Educ Psychol, 47, 3, pp. 153-176, (2012)