God and the Market: Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand

被引:0
作者
Paul Oslington
机构
[1] Australian Catholic University,
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2012年 / 108卷
关键词
Adam Smith; Invisible hand; Isaac Newton; Religion; Providence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The invisible hand image is at the centre of contemporary debates about capacities of markets, on which discussion of many other topics in business ethics rests. However, its meaning in Adam Smith’s writings remains obscure, particularly the religious associations that were obvious to early readers. He drew on Isaac Newton’s theories of divine action and providence, mediated through the moderate Calvinism of the eighteenth century Scottish circles in which he moved. I argue within the context of Smith’s general providential account of markets, the invisible hand operates restrain inequality and capital flight, thereby stabilizing the market system. Such an understanding of the invisible hand raises questions for contemporary religious and secular discussions of the capacities of markets in the wake of the global financial crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 438
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Bishop JD(1995)Adam Smith’s invisible hand argument Journal of Business Ethics 14 165-180
  • [2] Bitterman HJ(1940)Adam Smith’s empiricism and the law of nature Journal of Political Economy 48 487-520
  • [3] Brewer A(2009)On the other (invisible) hand History of Political Economy 41 519-543
  • [4] Coase R(1976)Adam Smith’s view of man Journal of Law and Economics 19 529-546
  • [5] Coase R(1977)The wealth of nations Economic Inquiry 15 309-325
  • [6] Darwall S(1999)Sympathetic liberalism: Recent work on Adam Smith Philosophy & Public Affairs 28 139-162
  • [7] Donald Winch(1997)Adam Smith’s problem and ours Scottish Journal of Political Economy 44 384-402
  • [8] Grampp W(2000)What did Smith mean by the invisible hand? Journal of Political Economy 108 441-465
  • [9] Harrison P(2011)Adam Smith and the history of the invisible hand Journal of the History of Ideas 72 29-49
  • [10] Jones HB(2010)Marcus Aurelius, the stoic ethic, and Adam Smith Journal of Business Ethics 95 89-96