Phenotypic plasticity with respect to salt stress response by Lotus glaber: the role of its AM fungal and rhizobial symbionts

被引:0
|
作者
Mariela Echeverria
Agustina Azul Scambato
Analía Inés Sannazzaro
Santiago Maiale
Oscar Adolfo Ruiz
Ana B. Menéndez
机构
[1] IIB-IINTECH/UNSAM-CONICET,Unidad de Biotecnología 3
[2] Universidad de Buenos Aires,Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
来源
Mycorrhiza | 2008年 / 18卷
关键词
Glomus intraradices; Mesorhizobium loti; Phenotypic plasticity; Salt stress; Lotus glaber;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our hypothesis is that Lotus glaber (a glycophytic species, highly tolerant to saline–alkaline soils) displays a plastic root phenotypic response to soil salinity that may be influenced by mycorrhizal and rhizobial microorganisms. Uninoculated plants and plants colonised by Glomus intraradices or Mesorhizobium loti were exposed to either 150 or 0 mM NaCl. General plant growth and root architectural parameters (morphology and topology) were measured and phenotypic plasticity determined at the end of the salt treatment period. Two genotypes differing in their salt tolerance capacity were used in this study. G. intraradices and M. loti reduced the total biomass of non-salinised, sensitive plants, but they did not affect that of corresponding tolerant ones. Root morphology of sensitive plants was greatly affected by salinity, whereas mycorrhiza establishment counteracted salinity effects. Under both saline conditions, the external link length and the internal link length of mycorrhizal salt-sensitive plants were higher than those of uninoculated control and rhizobial treatments. The topological trend (TT) was strongly influenced by genotype × symbiosis interaction. Under non-saline conditions, nodulated root systems of the sensitive plant genotype had a more herringbone architecture than corresponding uninoculated ones. At 150 mM NaCl, nodulated root systems of tolerant plants were more dichotomous and those of the corresponding sensitive genotype more herringbone in architecture. Notwithstanding the absence of a link between TTs and variations in plant growth, it is possible to predict a dissimilar adaptation of plants with different TTs. Root colonisation by either symbiotic microorganisms reduced the level of root phenotypic plasticity in the sensitive plant genotype. We conclude that root plasticity could be part of the general mechanism of L. glaber salt tolerance only in the case of non-symbiotic plants.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 329
页数:12
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Phenotypic plasticity with respect to salt stress response by Lotus glaber:: the role of its AM fungal and rhizobial symbionts
    Echeverria, Mariela
    Scambato, Agustina Azul
    Sannazzaro, Analia Ines
    Maiale, Santiago
    Ruiz, Oscar Adolfo
    Menendez, Ana B.
    MYCORRHIZA, 2008, 18 (6-7) : 317 - 329
  • [2] Phenotypic plasticity in response to dietary salt stress: Na+ and K+ transport by the gut of Drosophila melanogaster larvae
    Naikkhwah, Wida
    O'Donnell, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 215 (03): : 461 - 470
  • [3] Evolution of the corticotropin-releasing hormone signaling system and its role in stress-induced phenotypic plasticity
    Denver, RJ
    NEUROPEPTIDES: STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN BIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR, 1999, 897 : 46 - 53
  • [4] Diversity and mean specific leaf area of Mediterranean woody vegetation changes in response to summer drought across a double stress gradient: The role of phenotypic plasticity
    Carrascosa, Alejandro
    Silvestre, Mariola
    Morgado, Laura
    Azcarate, Francisco M.
    JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2023, 34 (02)
  • [5] COR15B expression is affected by chloroplast functionality and its role in response to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana
    Liu, D.
    Hou, L.
    Li, W. C.
    Cheng, J. F.
    Fu, Y. Q.
    BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2014, 58 (04) : 667 - 675
  • [6] Role of salt-induced RING finger protein 3 (OsSIRP3), a negative regulator of salinity stress response by modulating the level of its target proteins
    Park, Yong Chan
    Moon, Jun-Cheol
    Chapagain, Sandeep
    Oh, Dae Gyeom
    Kim, Jung Ju
    Jang, Cheol Seong
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2018, 155 : 21 - 30