Application of a simplified ADM1 for full-scale anaerobic co-digestion of cattle slurry and grass silage: assessment of input variability

被引:4
作者
Tisocco, Sofia [1 ,2 ]
Weinrich, Soeren [3 ,4 ]
Lyons, Gary [5 ]
Wills, Michael [5 ]
Zhan, Xinmin [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Crosson, Paul [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Galway, Coll Sci & Engn, Civil Engn, Galway H91TK33, Ireland
[2] Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Teagasc Anim & Biosci Res Dept, Dunsany C15PW93, Ireland
[3] Deutsch Biomasseforschungszentrum Gemeinnutzige Gm, Biochem Convers Dept, D-04347 Leipzig, Germany
[4] Munster Univ Appl Sci, Fac Energy Bldg Serv Environm Engn, D-48565 Steinfurt, Germany
[5] Agrifood & Biosci Inst, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, North Ireland
[6] Univ Galway, Ryan Inst, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland
[7] Univ Galway, MaREI Res Ctr Energy Climate & Marine, Ryan Inst, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland
关键词
ADM1; Agricultural feedstocks; Biogas technology; Input variability; Parameter estimation; SYSTEMATIC SIMPLIFICATION; MANURE; BIOMASS; IRELAND; BIOGAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11783-024-1810-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mathematical modeling of anaerobic digestion is a powerful tool to predict gas yields and optimize the process. The Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) is a widely implemented model for this purpose. However, modeling full-scale biogas plants is challenging due to the extensive substrate and parameter characterization required. This study describes the modification of the ADM1 through a simplification of individual process phases, characteristic components and required parameters. Consequently, the ability of the simplified model to simulate the co-digestion of grass silage and cattle slurry was evaluated using data from a full-scale biogas plant. The impacts of substrate composition (crude carbohydrate, protein and lipid concentration) and variability of carbohydrate degradability on simulation results were assessed to identify the most influential parameters. Results indicated that the simplified version was able to depict biogas and biomethane production with average model efficiencies, according to the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient, of 0.70 and 0.67, respectively, and was comparable to the original ADM1 (average model efficiencies of 0.71 and 0.63, respectively). The variability of crude carbohydrate, protein and lipid concentration did not significantly impact biogas and biomethane output for the data sets explored. In contrast, carbohydrate degradability seemed to explain much more of the variability in the biogas and methane production. Thus, the application of simplified models provides a reliable basis for the process simulation and optimization of full-scale agricultural biogas plants.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Methane production through anaerobic digestion of various energy crops grown in sustainable crop rotations
    Amon, Thomas
    Amon, Barbara
    Kryvoruchko, Vitally
    Machmueller, Andrea
    Hopfner-Sixt, Katharina
    Bodiroza, Vitomir
    Hrbek, Regina
    Friedel, Juergen
    Poetsch, Erich
    Wagentristl, Helmut
    Schreiner, Matthias
    Zollitsch, Werner
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (17) : 3204 - 3212
  • [2] Biogas production from maize and dairy cattle manure - Influence of biomass composition on the methane yield
    Amon, Thomas
    Amon, Barbara
    Kryvoruchko, Vitaliy
    Zollitsch, Werner
    Mayer, Karl
    Gruber, Leonhard
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 118 (1-4) : 173 - 182
  • [3] Mathematical modelling of anaerobic digestion processes: applications and future needs
    Batstone, Damien J.
    Puyol, Daniel
    Flores-Alsina, Xavier
    Rodriguez, Jorge
    [J]. REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND BIO-TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 14 (04) : 595 - 613
  • [4] Batstone DJ, 2002, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V45, P65
  • [5] Evaluation of the linear and non-linear prediction models optimized with metaheuristics: Application to anaerobic digestion processes
    Beltramo T.
    Hitzmann B.
    [J]. Engineering in Agriculture, Environment and Food, 2019, 12 (04): : 397 - 403
  • [6] Correlation between biogas yield and chemical composition of energy crops
    Dandikas, V.
    Heuwinkel, H.
    Lichti, F.
    Drewes, J. E.
    Koch, K.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 174 : 316 - 320
  • [7] Modified version of ADM1 model for agro-waste application
    Gali, A.
    Benabdallah, T.
    Astals, S.
    Mata-Alvarez, J.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 100 (11) : 2783 - 2790
  • [8] Gehring T., 2013, 13th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion: Recovering (bio) Resources for the World (28)
  • [9] Efficient Multi-Start Strategies for Local Search Algorithms
    Gyoergy, Andras
    Kocsis, Levente
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 2011, 41 : 407 - 444
  • [10] Iman, 2022, lhsgeneral(pd,correlation