Optimal life-cycle consumption and investment decisions under age-dependent risk preferences

被引:0
作者
Andreas Lichtenstern
Pavel V. Shevchenko
Rudi Zagst
机构
[1] Technical University of Munich,Department of Mathematics
[2] Macquarie University,Department of Actuarial Studies and Business Analytics
来源
Mathematics and Financial Economics | 2021年 / 15卷
关键词
Pension investments; Optimal life-cycle consumption and investment; Age-dependent risk aversion; HARA utility function; Martingale method; G11; G22; C61; D14;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this article we solve the problem of maximizing the expected utility of future consumption and terminal wealth to determine the optimal pension or life-cycle fund strategy for a cohort of pension fund investors. The setup is strongly related to a DC pension plan where additionally (individual) consumption is taken into account. The consumption rate is subject to a time-varying minimum level and terminal wealth is subject to a terminal floor. Moreover, the preference between consumption and terminal wealth as well as the intertemporal coefficient of risk aversion are time-varying and therefore depend on the age of the considered pension cohort. The optimal consumption and investment policies are calculated in the case of a Black–Scholes financial market framework and hyperbolic absolute risk aversion (HARA) utility functions. We generalize Ye (American control conference, 2008) by adding an age-dependent coefficient of risk aversion and extend Steffensen (J Econ Dyn Control 35(5):659–667, 2011), Hentschel (Planning for individual retirement: optimal consumption, investment and retirement timing under different preferences and habit persistence. Ph.D. thesis, Ulm University, 2016) and Aase (Stochastics 89(1):115–141, 2017) by considering consumption in combination with terminal wealth and allowing for consumption and terminal wealth floors via an application of HARA utility functions. A case study on fitting several models to realistic, time-dependent life-cycle consumption and relative investment profiles shows that only our extended model with time-varying preference parameters provides sufficient flexibility for an adequate fit. This is of particular interest to life-cycle products for (private) pension investments or pension insurance in general.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 313
页数:38
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]  
Aase KK(2017)The investment horizon problem: a possible resolution Stochastics 89 115-141
[2]  
Akian M(1996)On an investment-consumption model with transaction costs SIAM J. Control Optim. 34 329-364
[3]  
Menaldi JL(2008)Risk tolerance of individual investors in an emerging market Int. Res. J. Financ. Econ. 17 15-26
[4]  
Sulem A(2012)Differences in risk aversion between young and older adults Neurosci. Neuroecon. 2012 3-9
[5]  
Al-Ajmi J(2017)Optimal consumption and investment with fixed and proportional transaction costs SIAM J. Control Optim. 55 1673-1710
[6]  
Albert SM(2017)Optimal consumption, investment and housing with means-tested public pension in retirement Insur. Math. Econ. 75 32-47
[7]  
Duffy J(2019)Increasing risk aversion and life-cycle investing Math. Financ. Econ. 13 287-302
[8]  
Altarovici A(1994)Baby boom, population aging, and capital markets J. Bus. 67 165-202
[9]  
Reppen M(2004)Relative risk aversion among the elderly Rev. Financ. Econ. 13 269-281
[10]  
Soner HM(1986)Human capital and life-cycle effects on risk aversion J. Financ. Res. 9 41-51