Association Between Positive Human Papillomavirus Status After Conization and Disease Recurrence in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3

[1] Bzhalava D(2015)International standardization and classification of human papillomavirus types Virology 476 341-344

[2] Eklund C(2017)A cross-sectional study on HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening in 11,064 Chinese women Cancer Med 6 1091-1101

[3] Dillner J(2000)Persistence of human papillomavirus infection after therapeutic conization for CIN 3: is it an alarm for disease recurrence? Gynecol Oncol 79 294-299

[4] Wu Q(2008)Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study Lancet Oncol 9 425-434

[5] Zhao X(2019)Impact of the human papillomavirus status on the development of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy at the baseline: a 9-year Swedish nested case-control follow-up study Cancer 125 239-248

[6] Fu Y(2004)Usefulness of human papillomavirus testing in the follow-up of patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 1046-1051

[7] Nagai Y(2011)Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study Lancet Oncol 12 441-450

[8] Maehama T(2013)Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions APMIS 121 1153-1161

[9] Asato T(2000)Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study Gynecol Obstet Invest 50 264-268

[10] McCredie MR(2017)Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Oncol 18 1665-1679

[1] Bzhalava D(2015)International standardization and classification of human papillomavirus types Virology 476 341-344

[2] Eklund C(2017)A cross-sectional study on HPV testing with type 16/18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening in 11,064 Chinese women Cancer Med 6 1091-1101

[3] Dillner J(2000)Persistence of human papillomavirus infection after therapeutic conization for CIN 3: is it an alarm for disease recurrence? Gynecol Oncol 79 294-299

[4] Wu Q(2008)Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study Lancet Oncol 9 425-434

[5] Zhao X(2019)Impact of the human papillomavirus status on the development of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancy at the baseline: a 9-year Swedish nested case-control follow-up study Cancer 125 239-248

[6] Fu Y(2004)Usefulness of human papillomavirus testing in the follow-up of patients with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after conization Am J Obstet Gynecol 190 1046-1051

[7] Nagai Y(2011)Risk of recurrent high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful treatment: a long-term multi-cohort study Lancet Oncol 12 441-450

[8] Maehama T(2013)Post-cervical conization outcomes in patients with high-grade intraepithelial lesions APMIS 121 1153-1161

[9] Asato T(2000)Conization by harmonic scalpel for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a clinicopathological study Gynecol Obstet Invest 50 264-268

[10] McCredie MR(2017)Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Oncol 18 1665-1679