Disintegration of Italian rural landscapes to international environmental agreements

被引:0
作者
R. Guarino
F. Cutaia
A. L. Giacopelli
P. Menegoni
F. Pelagallo
C. Trotta
G. Trombino
机构
[1] University of Palermo,Department of STEBICEF
[2] University of Palermo,Department of Architecture
[3] ENEA UTAGRI – ECO (gestione sostenibile degli agroecosistemi),Faculty of Economy
[4] University of Rome-Tor Vergata,undefined
[5] Forum Plinianum,undefined
来源
International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
Landscape protection; Agriculture; Ecosystems; Biodiversity; Regional planning; SEA; Inland areas;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In Italy, the first law that puts landscape and historical buildings under public control was implemented in 1922. While this represents a significant achievement for those times, for that law landscape essentially has an historical and aesthetic connotation, without any explicit reference to the components of flora, fauna and geology. Today, many protection policies and initiatives are still biased by the lack of reference to the intrinsic value that biodiversity and ecosystem services have for the maintenance of traditional landscapes, as well as for the survival of the human species. The priority accorded to historical and aesthetic values can lead to a lack of attention to the complex relationship binding the natural environment, agriculture and urban processes. Hence, there is a need in Italy for an increased awareness of the functional role exerted by agriculture as a link between ecosystems and “techno” systems. The complex and polysemic concept of landscape plays a crucial role in designing new strategies for the rural territories, their economies and their cultures. Moving towards a shared and integrated strategy for multifunctional agriculture involves a substantial revision of the general objectives of growth and development, combining conservation and innovation. In this respect, the full integration of the Strategic Environmental Assessment in regional planning processes is one possible method for building a framework in which policies to promote the development, protection and enhancement of landscapes can work in an integrated way. These observations lead to some final conclusions on the network logic which should drive the integration process of planning and evaluation, along with some reflections on the Italian programme for inland areas.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 172
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Agnoletti M(2014)Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: Some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective Landscape and Urban Planning 126 66-73
[2]  
Babai D(2015)Do conservation and agri-environmental regulations effectively support traditional small-scale farming in East-Central European cultural landscapes? Biodiversity and Conservation 236 24-35
[3]  
Tóth A(2011)La VAS: raccordo tra sviluppo e ambiente Urbanistica Informazioni - INU, Roma 7 29-35
[4]  
Szentirmai I(2014)Conservazione del suolo e politiche di sviluppo nella programmazione comunitaria 2014–2020: Le aree interne Reticula 21 33-578
[5]  
Biró M(2013)Absolute zapovednost’ as an ethical model Bulletin of the European Grassland Group 81 569-33
[6]  
Máté A(2014)Considerazioni floristiche per un nuovo manifesto del terzo paesaggio Boll Acc Euteleti, San Miniato 3 32-357
[7]  
Fidanza A(2010)Paesaggi marginali e paesaggi mediati Ecoscienza 20 351-170
[8]  
Giacopelli AL(2010)Diversitas and Biodiversity: The roots of a 21st century myth Rendiconti Lincei - Scienze Fisiche e Naturali 3 133-157
[9]  
Guarino R(2006)Alternative composite Lisbon development strategy indices: A comparison of EU, USA, Japan and Korea The European Journal of Comparative Economics 74 132-405
[10]  
Menegoni P(1966)A new approach to consumer theory Journal of Political Economy 3 390-1092