Potential Linkages Between Social Capital, Flood Risk Perceptions, and Self-Efficacy

被引:0
作者
Paul Hudson
Liselotte Hagedoorn
Philip Bubeck
机构
[1] University of Potsdam,Institute of Environmental Science and Geography
[2] Vrije University,Institute for Environmental Studies
来源
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
Flood risk; Protection motivation theory; Risk perceptions; Social capital; Self-efficacy; Vietnam;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A growing focus is being placed on both individuals and communities to adapt to flooding as part of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. Adaptation to flooding requires sufficient social capital (linkages between members of society), risk perceptions (understanding of risk), and self-efficacy (self-perceived ability to limit disaster impacts) to be effective. However, there is limited understanding of how social capital, risk perceptions, and self-efficacy interact. We seek to explore how social capital interacts with variables known to increase the likelihood of successful adaptation. To study these linkages we analyze survey data of 1010 respondents across two communities in Thua Tien-Hue Province in central Vietnam, using ordered probit models. We find positive correlations between social capital, risk perceptions, and self-efficacy overall. This is a partly contrary finding to what was found in previous studies linking these concepts in Europe, which may be a result from the difference in risk context. The absence of an overall negative exchange between these factors has positive implications for proactive flood risk adaptation.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 262
页数:11
相关论文
共 177 条
[1]  
Aerts JCJH(2018)Integrating human behaviour dynamics into flood disaster risk assessment Nature Climate Change 8 193-199
[2]  
Botzen WJW(1998)Marine-related physical natural hazards affecting coastal megacities of the Asia-Pacific region – Awareness and mitigation Ocean & Coastal Management 40 65-85
[3]  
Clarke KC(2005)Perspectives on risk: Review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified and holistic approach Reliability Engineering & System Safety 90 1-14
[4]  
Cutter SL(2017)The two faces of social capital in private flood mitigation: Opposing effects on risk perception, self-efficacy, and coping capacity Journal of Risk Research 20 1017-1037
[5]  
Hall JW(1975)The myth of the natural disaster The Ecologist 5 368-369
[6]  
Merz B(2017)Threat, coping and flood prevention—A meta-analysis Journal of Environmental Psychology 54 116-126
[7]  
Michel-Kerjan E(2015)Divergence between individual perceptions and objective indicators of tail risks: Evidence from floodplain residents in New York City Judgment and Decision Making 10 365-385
[8]  
Mysiak J(2012)Do flood risk perceptions provide useful insights for flood risk management? Findings from central Vietnam Journal of Flood Risk Management 5 295-302
[9]  
Arthurton RS(2018)What helps people recover from floods? Insights from a survey among flood-affected residents in Germany Regional Environmental Change 18 287-296
[10]  
Aven T(1999)Community-based disaster management during the 1997 Red River flood in Canada Disasters 23 174-191