Managing co-production and enhancing good governance principles: insights from two case studies

被引:0
作者
Cristina Campanale
Sara Giovanna Mauro
Alessandro Sancino
机构
[1] University of Pisa,Department of Economics and Management
[2] Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna,Institute of Management
[3] Open University,undefined
来源
Journal of Management and Governance | 2021年 / 25卷
关键词
Co-production; Management of co-production; Good governance; Public services;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Co-production of public services is attracting growing attention, although little is known regarding its outcomes. This paper aims to examine how the management of co-production can enhance the principles of good governance, which are intended as its potential outcomes. To this purpose, the research investigates the key issues in managing co-production to explain how they contribute to enhancing good governance principles and fulfil the potential of co-production as a transformative governance arrangement suitable for achieving outcomes instead of being an outcome per se. Two case studies were carried out in Italy with data gathered from both desk analysis and focus groups with key actors involved in the process of co-production. The findings show that group co-production may require limited participation and inclusiveness of actors who have a direct stake in co-produced services and are able to contribute to them. The findings also show that state actors should consider the perspective of lay actors for co-producing usable information. Specifically, the co-elaboration of managerial tools and measures contributes to strengthening horizontal accountability mechanisms which, however, act mainly through commitment. This study contributes to the body of knowledge on co-production and good governance by investigating key issues that can enhance good governance principles. It also provides practitioners with significant insights into the management of co-production.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 306
页数:31
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Watching Sausage Being Made: Lessons learned from the co-production of governance in a behavioural health system [J].
Isett, Kimberley R. ;
Miranda, Jeanne .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 17 (01) :35-56
[23]   Institutionalizing co-production diplomacy in contexts of long-term epistemological conflict: A case study of cod fisheries governance [J].
Klenk, Nicole ;
Pentz, Brian ;
Mandrak, Nicholas E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY AND GOVERNANCE, 2025, 35 (02) :214-227
[24]   Co-production in HIV research: a case study from the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Vasiliki Papageorgiou ;
Jane Bruton ;
Halle Johnson ;
Silvia Petretti ;
Wezi Thamm ;
Joshua Anderson ;
Husseina Hamza ;
Helen Ward .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 11 (1)
[25]   Ethnographic insights into competing forms of co-production: A case study of the politics of street trees in a northern English city [J].
Flinders, Matthew ;
Wood, Matthew .
SOCIAL POLICY & ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 53 (02) :279-294
[26]   Traditional authorities and co-production in community development in northern Ghana: Insights from the Nandom Traditional Area [J].
Frederick Der Bebelleh .
SN Social Sciences, 1 (8)
[27]   Engaging citizens in collective co-production Insights from the Turna a N'Doma (back to the future) project [J].
Cavallone, Mauro ;
Palumbo, Rocco .
TQM JOURNAL, 2019, 31 (05) :722-739
[28]   More inclusive and cleaner cities with waste management co-production: Insights from participatory epistemologies and methods [J].
Gutberlet, Jutta .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 46 :234-243
[29]   Between co-production and institutional hybridity in land delivery: Insights from local planning practice in peri-urban Tamale, Ghana [J].
Akaateba, Millicent Awialie ;
Huang, Huang ;
Adumpo, Emile Akangoa .
LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 72 :215-226
[30]   Interference Analysis of Methane Co-Production from Two Coal Seams in Southern Qinshui Basin [J].
Quan, Fangkai ;
Wei, Chongtao ;
Hao, Shuqing ;
Ma, Jingsheng ;
Song, Yu ;
Lian, Da .
NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (03) :1475-1502