Interventions for Feeding and Swallowing Disorders in Adults with Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review of the Evidence

被引:0
作者
Beatrice Manduchi
Gina Marni Fainman
Margaret Walshe
机构
[1] Trinity College Dublin,Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies
来源
Dysphagia | 2020年 / 35卷
关键词
Intellectual disability; Dysphagia; Deglutition; Feeding; Systematic review; Intervention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Feeding and swallowing disorders are prevalent in adults with Intellectual Disability (ID) and can potentially lead to discomfort, malnutrition, dehydration, aspiration, and choking. Most common interventions include: diet modification, compensatory strategies, swallowing therapy, and non-oral feeding. Despite their common use, the research evidence for these interventions is lacking. The current study aimed to systematically review the evidence for the safety and the effectiveness of interventions for feeding and swallowing disorders in adults with ID. Seven electronic databases, conference proceedings, and reference lists of relevant studies were reviewed from online availability to March 2019, with no language restrictions. Eligibility criteria encompassed experimental or non-experimental study design, adults (> 18 years) with ID and feeding and/or swallowing disorders (any etiology and severity) and any intervention for feeding and/or swallowing disorders. Methodological quality was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Downs and Black checklist. Four articles met the inclusion criteria. All included studies considered enteral feeding as an intervention strategy and had a retrospective observational design. Overall, included studies reported positive change in nutritional status and a high incidence of adverse events following enteral feeding initiation. Risk of bias was high with variability in methodological quality. The safety and effectiveness of interventions for feeding and swallowing in adults with ID is unclear. This review highlights the lack of evidence-based practice in this area. Directions for further research are provided. Before enteral feeding initiation, risks and benefits should be appropriately balanced on an individual basis, and caregivers should be involved in the decision-making process.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 219
页数:12
相关论文
共 209 条
  • [1] Chadwick DD(2009)A descriptive investigation of dysphagia in adults with intellectual disabilities J Intellect Disabil Res 53 29-43
  • [2] Jolliffe J(2018)People with intellectual disabilities and dysphagia Disabil Rehabil 40 1345-1360
  • [3] Robertson J(2014)The Dysphagia Disorder Survey: Validation of an assessment for swallowing and feeding function in developmental disability Res Dev Disabil 35 929-942
  • [4] Chadwick DD(2017)Prevalence of dysphagia in people with intellectual disability: a systematic review Intellect Dev Disabil 55 377-391
  • [5] Baines S(2008)An audit of adults with profound and multiple learning disabilities within a West Midlands Community Health Trust: Implications for service development Br J Learn Disabil 36 38-47
  • [6] Emerson E(2008)Cutoff scores, norms and patterns of feeding problems for the Screening Tool of Feeding Problems (STEP) for adults with intellectual disabilities Res Dev Disabil 29 363-372
  • [7] Hatton C(1998)Mortality in people with learning disability: risks, causes, and death certificate findings in London Dev Med Child Neurol 40 50-56
  • [8] Sheppard JJ(2004)People with intellectual disabilities BMJ 329 414-895
  • [9] Hochman R(2014)The Confidential Inquiry into premature deaths of people with intellectual disabilities in the UK: a population-based study Lancet 383 889-342
  • [10] Baer C(2017)Cause of death and potentially avoidable deaths in Australian adults with intellectual disability using retrospective linked data BMJ Open 7 e013489-1138