Experimental study on seismic performance of double-level yielding buckling-restrained braced concrete frames

被引:11
作者
Zhang, Zhe [1 ]
Zhang, Sheng-Nan [1 ]
Deng, En-Feng [1 ]
Zhou, Tong-Tong [1 ]
Yi, Yu [2 ]
He, Hao [2 ]
Li, Na-Na [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Urban Planning Inst & Corp, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Buckling-restrained braces; Double-level yielding; Single-level yielding; Concrete frame; Seismic performance; Cyclic test; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s43452-020-00049-7
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper focused on the seismic performance of buckling-restrained braced concrete frame. Two different systems including the single-level yielding buckling-restrained braced concrete frame (SYBRBCF) and the double-level yielding buckling-restrained braced concrete frame (DYBRBCF) were designed for comparison. Compared with the single-level yielding buckling-restrained braces which are similar to many existing types of buckling-restrained braces, the double-level yielding buckling-restrained braces (DYBRBs) have two different energy absorption mechanisms that are expected to provide energy dissipations under the frequent earthquakes and rare earthquakes. To comparatively investigate the seismic performances of the two systems, cyclic tests were performed on one DYBRBCF specimen and another SYBRBCF specimen. The seismic response including the hysteretic curves, backbone curves, ductility coefficients, equivalent damping ratios, strengths, and stiffness degradations of the two experimental specimens was compared and analyzed. The test results indicate that the properly designed SYBRBCF and DYBRBCF can both exhibit the full hysteretic curves, meet the strong-column-weak-beam design requirement, and achieve the expected seismic performance. However, it was found that the ductility coefficient and energy dissipation capacity of the DYBRBCF were 72.2% and 23.4% higher than those of the SYBRBCF. The present study also provided useful design recommendations, which were beneficial to promote the application of DYBRBs.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Key parameters influencing performance and failure modes for BRBs using nonlinear FEA [J].
AlHamaydeh, Mohammad ;
Abed, Farid ;
Mustapha, Abdilwahhab .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2016, 116 :1-18
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, 5001120102016 GB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, J STRUCT ENG ASCE
[4]  
[Anonymous], J ARCH CIV ENG
[5]   Introduction and seismic performance investigation of the proposed lateral bracing system called "OGrid'' [J].
Boostani, Maryam ;
Rezaifar, Omid ;
Gholhaki, Majid .
ARCHIVES OF CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 18 (04) :1024-1041
[6]   Development of welded overlap core steel encased buckling-restrained braces [J].
Bozkurt, Mehmet Bakir ;
Topkaya, Cem .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2016, 127 :151-164
[7]   Evaluating out-of-plane stability for welded BRBs considering flexural restrainer and gusset rotations [J].
Chen, Li-Wei ;
Tsai, Keh-Chyuan ;
Tsai, Ching-Yi ;
Wu, An-Chien .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2019, 159 :161-175
[8]  
[程光煜 CHENG Guangyu], 2008, [建筑结构学报, Journal of Building Structures], V29, P40
[9]   Subassemblage tests and finite element analyses of sandwiched buckling-restrained braces [J].
Chou, Chung-Che ;
Chen, Sheng-Yang .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2010, 32 (08) :2108-2121
[10]  
Fujimoto M., 1988, SUMMARIES TECHNICAL, P1339