Indicators of Social Isolation: A Comparison Based on Survey Data from Germany

被引:16
作者
Eckhard, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Max Weber Inst Sociol, Bergheimer Str 58, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Social relationships; Personal relationships; Loneliness; Social disconnectedness; Close ties; OLDER-ADULTS; RISK-FACTORS; LONELINESS; HEALTH; MORTALITY; POVERTY; NETWORKS; COMMUNITY; SUPPORT; UNEMPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-017-1741-y
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The paper presents a data-based comparison of three indicators of social isolation that are frequently used in contemporary social research: (a) low frequency of social contact with friends, relatives, and neighbors (social contact indicator); (b) absence of a discussion network (discussion network indicator); (c) absence of social support (support indicator). All three indicators are in line with an understanding of social isolation as the absence of close personal relationships. However, as shown in this paper, they are correlated only weakly to each other and lead to different results concerning the overall share of social isolation, age disparities, and gender differences of social isolation. Against this background, the paper proceeds with considerations on the content validity and criterion validity of the three indicators. Different versions of each indicator are scrutinized to gain insights on content validity. Conclusions on criterion validity are drawn from an examination of the correlations between the indicators and health, poverty, satisfaction with family life, and satisfaction with social life. Findings suggest a higher validity of the social contact indicator compared to the other two indicators. Data source is the German Socio-Economic Panel. Discussions of content validity are additionally based on analyses using the German Family Survey and the German Aging Survey.
引用
收藏
页码:963 / 988
页数:26
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Andre<ss> H-J, 1999, LEBEN IN ARMUT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, the Underclass, and Public Policy
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, CONCEQUENCES MODERNI
[4]  
Atkinson A.B., 1998, EXCLUSION EMPLOYMENT
[5]  
Beck Ulrich., 1994, RISKANTE FREIHEITEN
[6]  
Beck Ulrich., 1986, RISIKOGESELLSCHAFT
[7]   From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium [J].
Berkman, LF ;
Glass, T ;
Brissette, I ;
Seeman, TE .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (06) :843-857
[8]  
Biordi D.L., 2013, Chronic illness: Impact and Intervention, P85, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1749-6632.2011.06028.X.SOCIAL, DOI 10.1016/J.ENFCLI]
[9]   Are the poor socially integrated?: The link between poverty and social support in different welfare regimes [J].
Boehnke, Petra .
JOURNAL OF EUROPEAN SOCIAL POLICY, 2008, 18 (02) :133-150
[10]   Small networks and high isolation? A reexamination of American discussion networks [J].
Brashears, Matthew E. .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2011, 33 (04) :331-341