Changes over time of extracellular domain of HER2 (ECD/HER2) serum levels have prognostic value in metastatic breast cancer

被引:0
作者
Vivien H. C. Bramwell
Gordon S. Doig
Alan B. Tuck
Sylvia M. Wilson
Katia S. Tonkin
Anna Tomiak
Francisco Perera
Theodore A. Vandenberg
Ann F. Chambers
机构
[1] London Regional Cancer Program,Department of Medicine
[2] Tom Baker Cancer Centre,Department of Pathology
[3] University of Sydney,Department of Oncology
[4] University of Western Ontario,Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics
[5] University of Western Ontario,Department of Medicine
[6] University of Calgary,undefined
[7] Cross Cancer Institute,undefined
[8] Queen’s University,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2009年 / 114卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Extracellular domain of HER2; Serial samples; Survival; Tumor markers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background Blood levels of the extracellular domain of HER-2/neu (ECD/HER2) have been suggested to have potential as a tumor marker in breast cancer. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of baseline levels of ECD/HER2, but more importantly changes in levels over time, in women with metastatic breast cancer. Methods Baseline and serial levels of ECD/HER2 were measured in 158 women with newly-diagnosed metastatic breast cancer, in whom we previously performed serial measurement of plasma osteopontin. ECD/HER2 was measured in 1,282 serum samples using a validated ELISA at baseline and every 3–12 weeks during and after therapy until death (median, n = 8 samples per patient). Multivariate time-dependent survival analyses were conducted using models that right-censored patient outcomes 3, 6 and 12 months after last known ECD/HER2 measurement. Results Thirty-four patients (22%) had elevated baseline ECD/HER2 (median 10.2 ng/ml: range 4.1–40.4 ng/ml). In univariate analysis, elevated baseline ECD/HER2 was associated with short survival (P = 0.001). In a multivariate model incorporating standard clinical prognostic factors, baseline ECD/HER2 was significantly associated with survival duration (RR 1.029; P = 0.020). Presence of visceral metastases and ECOG status 2–4 also retained significance. In a multivariate model incorporating standard prognostic factors and changes in sequential ECD/HER2 levels, an ECD/HER2 increase of >12 ng/ml at any time was the variable with most prognostic value for poor survival (RR 6.10; P = 0.0003); poor ECOG status also retained significance. Conclusion Increases over time of ECD/HER2 levels were strongly associated with poor survival in this cohort of women with metastatic breast cancer.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 143 条
[1]  
Swain SM(2005)Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials Lancet 365 1687-1717
[2]  
Piccart-Gebhart MJ(2005)Aromatase inhibitors—a triumph of translational oncology N Engl J Med 353 2807-2809
[3]  
Proctor M(2005)Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer N Engl J Med 353 1659-1672
[4]  
Leyland-Jones B(2005)Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer N Engl J Med 353 1673-1684
[5]  
Romond EH(2007)Recent major progress in long-term cancer patient survival disclosed by modelled period analysis J Clin Oncol 25 3274-3280
[6]  
Perez EA(2001)When is a tumor marker ready for prime time? A case study of c-erbB-2 as a predictive factor in breast cancer J Clin Oncol 9 2334-2356
[7]  
Bryant J(2003)Invasion factors uPA/PAI-1 and HER2 status provide independent and complementary information on patient outcome in node-negative breast cancer J Clin Oncol 21 1022-1028
[8]  
Brenner H(1996)Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer J Clin Oncol 14 2843-2877
[9]  
Gondos A(1998)1997 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer J Clin Oncol 16 793-795
[10]  
Arndt V(2001)2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology J Clin Oncol 19 1865-1878