Validation of the ‘Vienna List’ as a proxy measure of quality of life

被引:0
作者
J. Richter
M. Schwarz
M. Eisemann
B. Bauer
机构
[1] University of Rostock,Clinic of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
[2] Geriatric Rehabilitation Clinic Neubrandenburg,Bethesda Clinic
[3] University of Tromsø,Department of Psychology
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2004年 / 13卷
关键词
Geriatric inpatients; Rehabilitation; Severely demented; Validity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The reason for the study was to investigate the discriminative, content- and criterion-related validity of the ‘Vienna List’, a newly developed proxy-rating measurement for quality of life in very old and severely demented persons. The total population of patients of a geriatric rehabilitation clinic of one year (from November 2001 to October 2002; n=687) was evaluated at admission and discharge by means of this proxy rating method together with the mini mental state examination, the timed up and go test, the Tinetti measure, the Barthel Index, and the Katz activities of daily living list. Differences, mainly on factors communication, mobility, aggression, and negative affect, appeared between seven diagnostic groups as well between several care-related categories and destination after discharge. The five factors of the measurement explained a significant amount of variance with a high specificity and more than 50% of the Barthel Index scores. The ‘Vienna List’, originally developed for the assessment of quality of life in severely demented patients, proved to be a useful, differentiating, less time-consuming and practical tool for the documentation of the outcome of geriatric inpatient rehabilitation, as well.
引用
收藏
页码:1725 / 1735
页数:10
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Calman K.C.(1984)Quality of life in cancer patients-an hypothesis. J Med Ethics 10 124-127
[2]  
Silberfeld M.(1995)Position paper from the World Health Organization Soc Sci Med 41 1403-1410
[3]  
Rueda S.(2002)Content␣validity for dementia of three generic preference based␣health related quality of life instruments: European quality of life instrument, health utilities index, and quality of well-being (QWB) scale Qual Life Res 11 71-79
[4]  
Krahn M.(1999)Concepts and methods in the development of the ADRQL: An instrument for assessing health-related quality of life in persons with Alzheimer’s disease. J Ment Health Aging 5 33-48
[5]  
Naglie G.(1993)A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehab 74 531-536
[6]  
Rabins P.V.(1996)Observed affect in nursing home residents with Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol 51B 3-14
[7]  
Kasper J.D.(2002)Development of a Japanese quality␣of life instrument for older adults experiencing dementia␣(QLDJ). Intern J Aging Hum Dev 55 71-79
[8]  
Kleinman L.(2004)A new instrument to describe indicators of well-being in old-old patients with severe dementia Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2 10-276
[9]  
Black B.S.(2003)Quality of life as an indicator for successful geriatric inpatient rehabilitation – a validation study of the ‘Vienna List’. Arch Geront Geriat 37 265-65
[10]  
Patrick D.L.(1965)Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland St Medl J 14 61-67