Optimal Prediction of Bone Mineral Density with Ultrasonic Measurements in Excised Human Femur

被引:0
作者
G. Haïat
F. Padilla
R. Barkmann
S. Dencks
U. Moser
C.-C. Glüer
P. Laugier
机构
[1] Université Paris VI - UMR CNRS 7623,Laboratoire d’Imagerie Paramétrique
[2] Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein,Medizinische Physik, Klinik für Diagnostische Radiologie
[3] Sulzer Innotec,undefined
来源
Calcified Tissue International | 2005年 / 77卷
关键词
Speed of sound; Femur; BMD; Bone; Quantitative ultrasound;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Bone mineral density (BMD) measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) techniques is the current gold standard for osteoporotic fracture risk prediction. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques in transmission measurements are, however, increasingly recognized as an alternative approach. It is feasible to select different QUS methods, one type being optimized to assess microarchitectural properties of bone structure and another to assess BMD. Broadband ultrasonic attenuation (BUA) and ultrasonic velocity (UV) measured on the proximal human femur have been shown to be both significantly correlated with BMD. However, a great diversity of algorithms has been reported to measure the time-of-flight used to derive UV values. The purpose of this study was to determine which procedure results in the optimal BMD prediction at the proximal femur from ultrasound measurements. Thirty-eight excised human femurs were measured in transmission with a pair of focused 0.5−MHz central frequency transducers. Two-dimensional scans were performed and radiofrequency (RF) signals were recorded digitally at each scan position. BUA was estimated and eight different signal processing techniques were performed to estimate UV. For each signal-processing technique UV was compared to BMD. We show that the best prediction of BMD was obtained with signal-processing techniques taking into account only the first part of the transmitted signal (r2BMD-SOS = 0.86). Moreover, we show that a linear multiple regression using both BUA and speed of sound (SOS) and applied to site-matched regions of interest improved the accuracy of BMD predictions (r2BMD-SOS/BUA = 0.95). Our results demonstrate that selecting specific signal-processing methods for QUS variables allows optimal assessment of BMD. Correlation is sufficiently high that this specific QUS method can be considered as a good surrogate of BMD.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 192
页数:6
相关论文
共 177 条
[1]  
Cummings SR(1993)Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group Lancet 341 72-75
[2]  
Black DM(2004) ultrasound measurement at the human femur Calcif Tissue Int 75 421-430
[3]  
Nevitt MC(2005)Assessment of a new quantitative ultrasound calcaneus measurement: precision and discrimination of hip fractures in elderly women compared with dual X-ray absorptiometry Ultrasound Med Biol 31 987-360
[4]  
Browner W(2000)Comparison of an imaging heel quantitative ultrasound device (DTU-one) with densitometric and ultrasonic measurements Osteoporos Int 11 354-30
[5]  
Cauley J(2000)Ultrasound velocity and attenuation at different skeletal sites compared with bone mineral density measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry Br J Radiol 73 23-32
[6]  
Ensrud K(1996)Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia Br J Radiol 69 25-54
[7]  
Genant HK(1999)Correlation of femoral and lumbar DXA and calcaneal ultrasound, measured Bone 25 49-598
[8]  
Palermo L(1998) with intact soft tissues, with the Osteoporos Int 8 591-2435
[9]  
Scott J(1996) failure loads of the proximal femur Phys Med Biol 41 2421-1218
[10]  
Vogt TM(2001)A comparison of time-domain and frequency domain approaches to ultrasonic velocity measurement in trabecular bone J Acoust Soc Am 109 1213-165