Applications of gauge duality in robust principal component analysis and semidefinite programming

被引:0
作者
ShiQian Ma
JunFeng Yang
机构
[1] The Chinese University of Hong Kong,Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management
[2] Nanjing University,Department of Mathematics
来源
Science China Mathematics | 2016年 / 59卷
关键词
gauge optimization; gauge duality; polar function; antipolar set; singular value decomposition; robust principal component analysis; semidefinite programming; 65K05; 65K10; 65J22; 90C25;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Gauge duality theory was originated by Freund (1987), and was recently further investigated by Friedlander et al. (2014). When solving some matrix optimization problems via gauge dual, one is usually able to avoid full matrix decompositions such as singular value and/or eigenvalue decompositions. In such an approach, a gauge dual problem is solved in the first stage, and then an optimal solution to the primal problem can be recovered from the dual optimal solution obtained in the first stage. Recently, this theory has been applied to a class of semidefinite programming (SDP) problems with promising numerical results by Friedlander and Macêdo (2016). We establish some theoretical results on applying the gauge duality theory to robust principal component analysis (PCA) and general SDP. For each problem, we present its gauge dual problem, characterize the optimality conditions for the primal-dual gauge pair, and validate a way to recover a primal optimal solution from a dual one. These results are extensions of Friedlander and Macêdo (2016) from nuclear norm regularization to robust PCA and from a special class of SDP which requires the coefficient matrix in the linear objective to be positive definite to SDP problems without this restriction. Our results provide further understanding in the potential advantages and disadvantages of the gauge duality theory.
引用
收藏
页码:1579 / 1592
页数:13
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Ben-Tal A(2005)Non-Euclidean restricted memory level method for large-scale convex optimization Math Program 102 407-456
  • [2] Nemirovski A(2011)Robust principal component analysis? J ACM 58 1-73
  • [3] Candès E J(2013)PhaseLift: Exact and stable signal recovery from magnitude measurements via convex programming Comm Pure Appl Math 66 1241-1274
  • [4] Li X(2011)Rank-sparsity incoherence for matrix decomposition SIAM J Optim 21 572-596
  • [5] Ma Y(1956)An algorithm for quadratic programming Naval Res Logist Quart 3 95-110
  • [6] Candès E J(1987)Dual gauge programs, with applications to quadratic programming and the minimum-norm problem Math Program 38 47-67
  • [7] Strohmer T(2014)Gauge optimization and duality SIAM J Optim 24 1999-2022
  • [8] Voroninski V(2002)An inverse free preconditioned Krylov subspace method for symmetric generalized eigenvalue problems SIAM J Sci Comput 2 312-334
  • [9] Chandrasekaran V(1995)Proximal level bundle methods for convex nondifferentiable optimization, saddle-point problems and variational inequalities Math Program 69 89-109
  • [10] Sanghavi S(1995)New variants of bundle methods Math Program 69 111-147