Synaptic shunting by a baseline of synaptic conductances modulates responses to inhibitory input volleys in cerebellar Purkinje cells

被引:0
作者
Lisa Kreiner
Dieter Jaeger
机构
[1] Emory University,Department of Biology
来源
The Cerebellum | 2004年 / 3卷
关键词
synaptic coding; spike timing; cerebellum; shunting; dynamic clamp; inhibition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When processing synaptic input in vivo, large neurons in the brain must cope with thousands of events each second. Much work has focused on the specific processing of synchronous excitatory input volleys, both in cerebellar and cerebral cortical research. Here we pursue the question of how a continuous background of ongoing ‘noise’ inputs interacts with the processing of synchronous inhibitory input volleys. Specifically we examine the processing of inhibitory input transients in cerebellar Purkinje cells, which by inducing pauses in Purkinje cell spike activity may lead to a disinhibition of the deep cerebellar nuclei and thus to cerebellar motor command signals. We use the technique of dynamic clamping in vitro to simulate controlled patterns of in vivo like background inputs. We use electrical stimulation of inhibitory interneurons in the deep or upper molecular layer to create inhibitory input transients that lead to spike pauses in Purkinje cell activity. These pauses were much longer in the absence than in the presence of background inputs applied with dynamic clamping. We found that a significant amount of the synaptic current elicited by electrical stimulation was shunted by the background inputs. The overall amount of background conductance as well as the pattern of background inputs modulated spike pause duration in a specific manner. This modulation by shunting may be employed in vivo to evaluate the salience of specific sensory input received by cerebellar cortex.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 125
页数:13
相关论文
共 95 条
[31]  
Albus JS(2002)Reciprocal bidirectional plasticity of parallel fiber receptive fields in cerebellar purkinje cells and their afferent interneurons Neuron 34 797-806
[32]  
Medina JF(1977)Cutaneous receptive fields of cerebellar Purkinje cells of unanesthetized cats Exp Brain Res 27 319-333
[33]  
Mauk MD(1983)Congruence of spatial organization of tactile projections to granule cell and Purkinje cell layers of cerebellar hemispheres of the albino rat: vertical organization of cerebellar cortex J Neurophysiol 49 745-766
[34]  
Sharp AA(1999)Differences in responses to 70 dB clicks of cerebellar units with simple versus complex spike activity: (i) in medial and lateral ansiform lobes and flocculus; and (ii) before and after conditioning blink conditioned responses with clicks as conditioned stimuli Neuroscience 90 1227-1241
[35]  
O’Neil MB(1994)Neural basis for motor learning in the vestibuloocular reflex of primates. II. Changes in the responses of horizontal gaze velocity Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus J Neurophysiol 72 954-973
[36]  
Abbott LF(2002)Modulatory effects of parallel fibers and stellate cell synaptic activity on Purkinje cell responses to ascending segment input: a modeling study J Comput Neurosci 13 217-235
[37]  
Marder E(1999)Impact of network activity on the integrative properties of neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo J Neurophysiol 81 1531-1547
[38]  
Robinson HPC(1994)An active membrane model of the cerebellar Purkinje cell I. Simulation of current clamp in slice J Neurophysiol 71 375-400
[39]  
Kawai N(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[40]  
Hanson JE(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined