Advancing effects analysis for integrated, large-scale wildfire risk assessment

被引:0
作者
Matthew P. Thompson
David E. Calkin
Julie W. Gilbertson-Day
Alan A. Ager
机构
[1] USDA Forest Service,Rocky Mountain Research Station
[2] University of Montana,College of Forestry and Conservation
[3] USDA Forest Service,Western Wildland Environmental Threat Assessment Center
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2011年 / 179卷
关键词
Wildfire risk; Risk assessment; Effects analysis; Expert system; Uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this article, we describe the design and development of a quantitative, geospatial risk assessment tool intended to facilitate monitoring trends in wildfire risk over time and to provide information useful in prioritizing fuels treatments and mitigation measures. The research effort is designed to develop, from a strategic view, a first approximation of how both fire likelihood and intensity influence risk to social, economic, and ecological values at regional and national scales. Three main components are required to generate wildfire risk outputs: (1) burn probability maps generated from wildfire simulations, (2) spatially identified highly valued resources (HVRs), and (3) response functions that describe the effects of fire (beneficial or detrimental) on the HVR. Analyzing fire effects has to date presented a major challenge to integrated risk assessments, due to a limited understanding of the type and magnitude of changes wrought by wildfire to ecological and other nonmarket values. This work advances wildfire effects analysis, recognizing knowledge uncertainty and appropriately managing it through the use of an expert systems approach. Specifically, this work entailed consultation with 10 fire and fuels program management officials from federal agencies with fire management responsibilities in order to define quantitative resource response relationships as a function of fire intensity. Here, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept application of the wildland fire risk assessment tool, using the state of Oregon as a case study.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 239
页数:22
相关论文
共 116 条
[1]  
Ager AA(2007)Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in Central Oregon, USA Forest Ecology and Management 246 45-56
[2]  
Finney MA(2010)Analyzing management tradeoffs between forest restoration and wildfire mitigation in a wildland urban interface Forest Ecology and Management 259 1556-1570
[3]  
Kerns BK(1997)Analyzing uncertainties in experts’ opinions of forest plan performance Forest Science 43 521-528
[4]  
Maffei H(2005)Forest landowner decisions and the value of information under fire risk Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35 2603-2615
[5]  
Ager AA(2008)Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making Ecological Modelling 219 383-399
[6]  
Valliant NM(2007)A decision support system for managing forest fire casualties Journal of Environmental Management 84 412-418
[7]  
Finney MA(2005)Preference anomalies, preference elicitation, and the discovered preference hypothesis Environmental and Resource Economics 32 55-89
[8]  
Alho JM(2009)Probabilistic risk modeling at the wildland urban interface: The 2003 Cedar Fire Environmetrics 20 607-620
[9]  
Kangas J(2008)Reliability of individual valuations of public and private goods: Choice consistency, response time, and preference refinement Journal of Public Economics 92 1595-1606
[10]  
Amacher GS(2005)Modeling trade-offs between fire threat reduction and late-seral forest structure Canadian Journal of Forest Resources 35 2562-2574