Using machine learning to improve Q-matrix validation

被引:0
作者
Haijiang Qin
Lei Guo
机构
[1] Southwest University,Faculty of Psychology
[2] Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality,Southwest University Branch
来源
Behavior Research Methods | 2024年 / 56卷
关键词
Cognitive diagnosis; Q-matrix validation; Machine learning; G-DINA; Classification;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Q-matrix, which specifies the relationship between items and attributes, is a crucial component of cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs). A precisely specified Q-matrix allows for valid cognitive diagnostic assessments. In practice, a Q-matrix is usually developed by domain experts, and noted as being subjective and potentially containing misspecifications which can decrease the classification accuracy of examinees. To overcome this, some promising validation methods have been proposed, such as the general discrimination index (GDI) method and the Hull method. In this article, we propose four new methods for Q-matrix validation based on random forest and feed-forward neural network techniques. Proportion of variance accounted for (PVAF) and coefficient of determination (i.e., the McFadden pseudo-R2) are used as input features for developing the machine learning models. Two simulation studies are carried out to examine the feasibility of the proposed methods. Finally, a sub-dataset of the PISA 2000 reading assessment is analyzed as illustration.
引用
收藏
页码:1916 / 1935
页数:19
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] Breiman L(2001)Random forests Machine Learning 45 5-32
  • [2] Chen Y(2018)Bayesian estimation of the DINA Q matrix Psychometrika 83 89-108
  • [3] Culpepper SA(2013)Statistical refinement of the Q-matrix in cognitive diagnosis Applied Psychological Measurement 37 598-618
  • [4] Chen Y(2009)Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: Theory and applications Psychometrika 74 633-665
  • [5] Douglas J(2019)A Gibbs sampling algorithm that estimates the Q-matrix for the DINA model Journal of Mathematical Psychology 93 102275-362
  • [6] Chiu C-Y(2008)An empirically based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications Journal of Educational Measurement 45 343-199
  • [7] Chiu C-Y(2011)Erratum to: The Generalized DINA Model Framework Psychometrika 76 179-529
  • [8] Douglas J(2016)A general method of empirical Q-matrix validation Psychometrika 81 528-353
  • [9] Li X(2004)Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis Psychometrika 69 333-40
  • [10] Chung MT(2019)On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models Psychometrika 84 19-403