Characteristics of nitrogen flow and environmental cost of reactive nitrogen in the source area of the Yellow River Basin, China

被引:0
作者
Xinxin Song
Huanhuan Pu
Yingying Zhang
Xuguang Liu
Yongqiang Zhao
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Normal University,School of Geography and Tourism
[2] Henan Zhongzhicheng Information Technology Co.,undefined
[3] Ltd,undefined
来源
Environment, Development and Sustainability | 2023年 / 25卷
关键词
Regional environment; Sustainable development; Reactive nitrogen emission; Potential damage cost; Environmental damage;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evaluating reactive nitrogen (Nr) flow characteristics and its environmental damage costs can help formulate effective ecological environmental mitigation methods. Here, the amount of Nr emissions and its environmental damage costs in the source area of Yellow River Basin were evaluated using the methods of material flow analysis and cost–benefit analysis, and the mitigation potential of its Nr emissions was also explored. The total input and output of N were 5201.2–4986.7 Gg N yr−1, respectively, with atmospheric deposition and biological N fixation which were the main input sources. About 15.1% of the total N input was emitted into the atmosphere and hydrosphere, with the grassland and forest subsystems being the main contributors. The potential damage cost of Nr emissions was about 8.5 billion ¥ yr−1, and 66.1%, 21.6% and 12.3% were, respectively, related to health damage, climate impact, biodiversity and aesthetic loss. The potential damage costs caused by gaseous Nr was 3.0 times that of water bodies, and the unit damage cost of surface water Nr was 2.1 times that of gaseous Nr. Soil erosion of grassland and forest subsystems and industrial production activities were the main causes of environmental damage and economic losses. It is particularly important to strengthen water and soil conservation of grassland and forest subsystems in the source area of the rivers.
引用
收藏
页码:13379 / 13397
页数:18
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [1] Birch MB(2011)Why metrics matter: Evaluating policy choices for reactive nitrogen in the Chesapeake bay watershed Environmental Science and Technology 45 168-174
  • [2] Gramig BM(2020)Sustainable development in the yellow river basin: Issues and strategies Journal of Cleaner Production 263 12-19
  • [3] Moomaw WR(2009)Eutrophication of US freshwaters: Analysis of potential economic damages Environmental Science and Technology 43 3503-3524
  • [4] Doering OC(2019)Trajectories of nitrate input and output in three nested catchments along a land use gradient Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 23 1-11
  • [5] Reeling CJ(2020)High quality regional development research based on geographical units: discuss on the difference in development conditions and priorities of the yellow river basin compared to the Yangtze river basin Economic Geography 40 2185-2191
  • [6] Chen Y(2019)Effects of warming and nitrogen addition on plant community structure and species diversity of alpine meadow in northern Tibet Ecological Environmental Science 28 1841-1847
  • [7] Fu B(2009)Nitrogen mass balance of a tile-drained agricultural watershed in east-central Illinois Journal Environmental Quality 38 1121-9427
  • [8] Zhao Y(2021)A national nitrogen target for Germany Sustainability 13 9420-8797
  • [9] Wang K(2012)Atmospheric reactive nitrogen in China: Sources, recent trends, and damage costs Environmental Science and Technology 46 8792-1118
  • [10] Zhao M(2015)Integrated reactive nitrogen budgets and future trends in China PNAS 112 1109-658