What brand do I use for my new product? The impact of new product branding decisions on firm value

被引:0
作者
Larisa Kovalenko
Alina Sorescu
Mark B. Houston
机构
[1] Boston College,Marketing and Paula and Steve Letbetter ‘70 Chair
[2] Texas A&M University,Marketing and Eunice & James L. West Chair
[3] Texas Christian University,undefined
来源
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | 2022年 / 50卷
关键词
New product introduction; Branding decisions; Brand extensions; Firm value; Tobin’s Q; Event study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Every new product introduction entails a branding decision: whether to name the product using a direct extension, a sub-brand, or a new brand. While previous research has focused on how consumers evaluate alternatives in lab settings, or, in studies based on secondary data, on the effectiveness of brand extensions in general, a comprehensive framework of the antecedents and consequences of new product branding decisions is lacking from the literature. The authors propose a theoretical framework that organizes product-, category-, and firm-level determinants of firms’ new product branding decisions, and empirically test the framework’s predictions using a large sample of new product introductions, documenting with real world data how managers choose among three branding alternatives. In addition, using both product-specific and firm-specific valuation metrics, the authors quantify the negative impact on firm value of misaligning the new product branding decisions with the conditions facing new products. Conceptually, the authors bridge the branding and new product performance literatures, and present findings that extend knowledge from behavioral research on brand extensions. Empirically, the authors provide evidence to managers on how to choose brand names for new products in a way that enhances the stock market value of firms.
引用
收藏
页码:338 / 365
页数:27
相关论文
共 198 条
  • [1] Aaker DA(1990)Brand extensions: The good, the bad, and the ugly Sloan Management Review 31 47-56
  • [2] Aaker DA(2004)Leveraging the corporate brand California Management Review. 46 6-18
  • [3] Aaker DA(2000)The brand relationship spectrum: The key to the brand architecture challenge California Management Review 42 8-23
  • [4] Joachimsthaler E(1990)Consumer evaluations of brand extensions Journal of Marketing 54 27-41
  • [5] Aaker DA(1996)Brand development versus new product development: Towards a process model of extension decisions Marketing Intelligence & Planning 14 10-19
  • [6] Keller KL(1988)Strategic implications of Darwinian economics for selling efficiency and choice of integrated or independent sales forces Management Science 34 599-618
  • [7] Ambler T(2003)Reciprocal spillover effects: A strategic benefit of brand extensions Journal of Marketing 67 4-13
  • [8] Styles C(1991)Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage Journal of Management 17 99-120
  • [9] Anderson E(2018)The misuse of accounting-based approximations of Tobin’s Q in a world of market-based assets Marketing Science 37 484-504
  • [10] Balachander S(1996)Branded variants: A retail perspective Journal of Marketing Research 33 9-19